PENGGUNAAN WRITTEN CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK DALAM MENINGKATKAN KETERAMPILAN MENULIS DESCRIPTIVE TEXT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53682/kompetensi.v4i12.10889Keywords:
Written Corrective Feedback, Descriptive Text, Keterampilan Menulis, Pembelajaran Bahasa InggrisAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan penerpaan metode Written Corrective Feedback< em> WCF dalam meningkatkan keterampilan menulis descriptive text< em> peserta didik kelas 10 Penelitian menggunakan desain Penelitian Tindakan Kelas PTK atau Classroom Action Research< em> CAR berdasarkan model spiral Kemmis dkk 2014 yang melibatkan empat tahapan utama: perencanaan tindakan pengamatan dan refleksi Penelitian dilakukan selama tiga siklus di SMA Negeri 1 Remboken Sulawesi Utara dengan subjek penelitian 27 peserta didik kelas 10 B Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi proses pembelajaran dan tes menulis descriptive text< em> menggunakan rubrik penilaian yang berfokus pada lima aspek utama: topic< em> grammar< em> vocabulary< em> coherence< em> dan comprehension< em> Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penerapan WCF secara efektif meningkatkan keterampilan menulis peserta didik Nilai rata rata peserta didik meningkat dari 73 66 pada kondisi awal menjadi 81 06 pada Siklus I 86 50 pada Siklus II dan 88 86 pada Siklus III Ketuntasan belajar klasikal juga mengalami peningkatan signifikan dari 25 92 pada kondisi awal menjadi 51 85 pada Siklus I 81 48 pada Siklus II dan mencapai 88 89 pada Siklus III melampaui target ketuntasan yang ditetapkan Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa kombinasi written corrective feedback< em> dengan pendekatan TPACK mampu meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris secara signifikan baik dari segi hasil belajar maupun keterampilan menulis peserta didik < p>
References
Anderson M Anderson K 1998 Text types in English 3 Macmillan
Barber J P 2009 Integration of learning: Meaning making for undergraduates through connection application and synthesis Doctoral dissertation University of Michigan Retrieved from https: deepblue lib umich edu bitstream handle 2027 42 62211 jpbarber_1 pdf?sequence=1
Cattani A Abbot Smith K Farag R Krott A Arreckx F Dennis I Floccia C 2014 How much exposure to English is necessary for a bilingual toddler to perform like a monolingual peer in language tests? International journal of language communication disorders 49 6 649 671 https: doi org 10 1111 1460 6984 12082
Chung B 2015 Written corrective feedback: The perception of Korean EFL learners Journal of Pan Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics 19 2 75 88
Corder S P 1974 The significance of learners errors In J C Richards Ed Error analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition pp 19 27 Longman
De Wilde V Brysbaert M Eyckmans J 2020 Learning English through out of school exposure Which levels of language proficiency are attained and which types of input are important? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23 1 171 185 https: doi org 10 1017 S1366728918001062
Ebrahimzadeh M Khodareza R M 2016 The effect of hedged form feedback vs uncoded feedback on grammatical accuracy of Iranian intermediate EFL learners International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching Research 4 15 25 33
Halliday M A K Matthiessen C 2014 Halliday s Introduction to Functional Grammar 4th ed Oxon: Routledge
Ihejirika R C 2014 Literature and English language teaching and learning: A symbiotic relationship English Language Teaching 7 3 85 90
Kemmis S McTaggart R Nixon R 2014 The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research Springer
Khanlarzadeh M Nemati N 2016 The effect of written corrective feedback on grammatical accuracy of EFL students: An improvement over previous unfocused design Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 4 2 55 68
Kumaran P N Krish P 2021 Mother Tongue Interference in English Writing among Tamil School Students Gema Online Journal of Language Studies 21 1 110 123 http: doi org 10 17576 gema 2021 2101 07
Lubna K S Q A Toyyibah T 2024 Factors Affecting the Success of Learning English with Limited Exposure: Reflections from Non English Department Students Journal of Language Intelligence and Culture 6 2 175 187 https: doi org 10 35719 jlic v6i2 126
Maleki A Eslami E 2013 The effects of written corrective feedback techniques in EFL students control over grammatical construction of their written English Theory and Practice in Language Studies 3 7 1250 1257
Mohammad T Hazarika Z 2016 Difficulties of learning EFL in KSA: Writing skills in context International Journal of English Linguistics 6 3 105 117
Pabur H Liando N V 2018 A perspective on written corrective feedback Diakses dari http: repository unima ac id:8080 bitstream 123456789 274 1 No 2024 20GCES 202018 20Proceeding 20 20Pabur 20 26 20Liando pdf
Rahayu R Basri N 2021 Mother Tongue Interference in Learning English in English Meeting Club FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching 2 3 387 397 https: doi org 10 24256 foster jelt v2i3 48
Ranta L Meckelborg A 2013 How much exposure to English do international graduate students really get? Measuring language use in a naturalistic setting Canadian modern language review 69 1 1 33 https: doi org 10 3138 cmlr 987
Rukmini D Sofwan A Fitriati S W 2017 The effect of writing feedback techniques and students writing anxiety on students essay writing ability International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching Research 5 18 37 51
Septianasari L 2019 Mother tongue issues and challenge in learning English as foreign language IJIET International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching 3 2 204 214 https: doi org 10 24071 ijiet v3i2 1941
Shao X 2015 On written corrective feedback in L2 writing English Language Teaching 8 3 155 168
Srihanyachon N 2012 Teacher written feedback for L2 learners writing development Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences Humanities and Arts 12 1 7 11
Wardiman A Jahur M B Djusma M S 2008 English in Focus: for Grade VII Junior High School SMP MTs Jakarta: Pusat Perbukuan DEPDIKNAS
Yi J Y 2009 Defining writing ability for classroom writing assessment in high schools Journal of Pan Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics 13 1 53 69
Zamel V 1982 Writing: The process of discovery meaning TESOL Quarterly 16 2 195 209
Zarei A A Rahnama M 2013 The effect of written corrective feedback modes on EFL learners grammatical and lexical writing accuracy: From perception to facts International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature 1 3 1 14
