Readability Assessment of Reading Texts in Pathway to English for  SMA/MA Grade X

Rara Anggreiny Lumepa; Jim Ronny  Tuna; Fivy A Andries

doi:10.53682/kompetensi.v1i04.1856

Authors

Rara Anggreiny Lumepa Universitas Negeri Manado
Jim Ronny Tuna Universitas Negeri Manado
Fivy A Andries Universitas Negeri Manado

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53682/kompetensi.v1i04.1856

Keywords:

Readability, Reading Text, Textbook

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to describe readability of reading texts in textbook,
‘Pathway to English’ for SMA/MA Grade X’ published by Erlangga. The study is a
quantitative content analysis. The source of the data was the textbook, and only reading
texts with minimally 150 words in length were taken as the sample. 22 reading texts
that matched the criteria were analyzed quantitatively in percentage form. Result of the
data analysis shows that reveals that 9 (or 41%) reading texts match tenth grade level,
but the rest, 4 (or 18%) reading texts are to easy, at 7th-8th grade level. and 9 (or 41%)
reading texts are are fairly difficult to difficult, at 11th-16th grade level. Put it another
way, 59% reading texts with minimally 150 words in length selected for use in EFL
textbook ‘Pathway to English’ published by Penerbit Erlangga in 2016 were not in
accordance with tenth grade SMA students’ readability level. In addition, It was also
found that the data show that readability level of a text do not depend on text length.

References

Aebersold, J. A., and M. L Field. 1997. From

Reading to Reading Teacher Issues and

Strategies for Second Language

Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge

University.

Al-Brashdi, B. 2002. Reading in English as

a foreign language: A descriptive study

on Omani university students’ reading

comprehension problems and strategies.

Unpublished master’s thesis: University

of Reading, United Kingdom.

Al Sayabi, Fawzia & Tuzlukova, Victoria.

Investigating EFL Reading

Problems and Strategies in Post-Basic

Schools and University Foundation

Programs: A Study in the Omani

Context. Malaysian Journal of ELT

Research, Vol. 11(2).

Berelson, B. 1952. Content analysis in

communication research. New York,

NY: Free Press.

Carrel, Patricia L. 1987. Readability in ESL.

Reading in a Foreign Language, 4 (1),

-40.

Chall, J.S & Dale, E. 1995. Readability

revisited: The New Dale-Chall

readability formula. Brookline Books

Dale, E. & Chall, J. S. 1949. The concept of

readability. Elementary English, 26, 23.

Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., &

Pearson, P. D. 1991. Moving from the

old to the new: Research on reading

comprehension instruction. Review of

Educational Research, 61.2, 239-264.

doi: 10.3102/00346543061002239.

Franzosi, Roberto P. 2004. Content Analysis

in Handbook of Data Analysis. SAGE

Researchmethods. DOI:

https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608

n24

Fry, E. 2002. Readability Versus Leveling.

The Reading Teacher 56 (3), 286-291

Hedgcock, J. S., & Dana R. Ferris. 2009.

Teaching Readers of English, Students,

Texts, and Contexts. Madison Ave, NY:

Routledge.

Indrawan, Fani. 2018. Text Readability and

Syntactic Complexity in the Reading

Texts of Indonesian Senior High School

Textbooks. Thesis. Universitas

Airlangga.

Kasim, Usman & Raisha, Siti. 2017. EFL

Students’ Reading Comprehension Problems: Linguistic and NonLinguistic Complexities. English

Education journal, (EEJ), 8(3), 308-321.

Klare, George R. 1968. The Role of Word

Frequency in Readability. In J. R.

Bormuth (Ed), Readability (pp. 7-17).

Chicago: National Council of Teacher

of English.

Maryansyah, Yupika. 2016. An Analysis on

Readability of English Reading Texts

for Grade IX Students at MTsN 2 Kota

Bengkulu. Premise Journal, Volume 5

No 1.

McLaughlin, G.H.1969. A New readability

formula. Journal of Reading22:639-

SMOG Grading

O’Sullivan, A. 2009. Reading in the Gulf: Is

it time for a re-focus? In Cultivating

Real Readers (pp. 43-51)

Pikulski, John. 2002. Readability: A

Definition. Houghton Mifflin

Company. University of Delaware.

Qarqez, Mohammed & Ab Rashid,

Radzuwan. 2017. Reading

Comprehension Difficulties among

EFL Learners: The Case of First and

Second Year Students at Yarmouk

University in Jordan. Arab World

English Journal, Vol. 8 No. 3: pp. 421-

Rahmawati, Yuly Ika & Lestari, Lies Amin.

The Readability Level of Reading

Texts in the English Language

Textbooks Used by Tenth Grade.

http://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/inde

x.php/retain/article/viewFile/8481/8597

Richard, Jack C., & Schmidt, Richard. 2002.

Longman Dictionary of Language

Teaching & Applied Linguistic. (Third

Edition). London: Pearson Education

Limited.

Rohmatillah. 2015. Readibility Level of

Reading Texts in the English Textbook

Entitled English Alive for Senior High

School Grade X Published by

Yudhistira.

https://media.neliti.com/media/publicat

ions/60430-EN-readibility-level-ofreading-texts-in-th.pdf

Salehi, Mohammad., Zahra, Lari., &,

Atefeh, Rezanejad. 2014. The effects of

gender and genre on language learners’

reading comprehension ability.

Education Journal, 3(5): 266-271

Stanovich Keith E. 1980. Toward an

Interactive-Compensatory Model of

Individual Differences in the

Development of Reading Fluency.

Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 16,

No. 1, pp. 32-71.

Stephen. 2018. What is readability and why

does it matter? Available at and

accessed September 14, 2020 from

https://medium.com/@uistephen/whatis-readability-and-why-does-it-matter7773d018e4b9

Ulusoy, M. 2006. Readability Approaches:

Implication for Turkey. International

Education Journal, 7 (3), 323-332

Aebersold, J. A., and M. L Field. 1997.

From Reading to Reading Teacher

Issues and Strategies for Second

Language Classroom. Cambridge:

Cambridge University.