Language Preference of the Indonesia Economic Subjects' toward Product Labeling

Authors

  • Veronika Listi Ferdini Damopolii Universitas Negeri Manado

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53682/kompetensi.v2i03.4749

Keywords:

language attitude, economists.

Abstract

The shift of Indonesian Language to Foreign Languages also applies to the labeling of
selling products in Indonesia. Economic actors have the choice of maintaining Indonesian
language or using foreign language when labeling the product they are going to sell. This
study aims to see the language attitude of economic actors towards the products to be
marketed. In addition, this study was conducted to see the number of foreign and
Indonesian languages used in the country when labeling the products they sell. This
research method uses descriptive methods to make descriptions, descriptions, or paintings
systematically, factually and accurately. The result obtained is that economic actors prefer
to label products in foreign languages rather than Indonesian. From the data found, there
are 50 product labels. There are 33 domestic products labeling their products in foreign
terms and only 17 domestic products label their products in Indonesian terms.

References

Nazir, M. 1988. Metode Penelitian.

Ghalia Indonesia: Jakarta.

Sugiyono. 2005. Metode Penelitian

Administrasi. Bandung: Alfabeta

Whitney, F. 1960. The Element Of Research.

New York :Prentice-Hall, Inc

Azhar, Iqbal Nurul. 2010. Sikap Bahasa

(Language Attitude).

https://pusatbahasaalazhar.wordpres

s.com/ hakikat-hakikikemerdekaan/sikap-bahasalanguage-attitude/ (daring). Diakses

pada 28 Agustus 2018.

Azwar, S. 2007. Sikap Manusia Teori dan

Pengukurannya. Edisi 2.

Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Chaer, Abdul dan Leonie Agustina. 2004.

Sosiolinguistik Perkenalan Awal.

Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Elena Villar, M., Di Ai, and Sigal Segev.

Chinese and American

perceptions of foreign‐name brands’,

Journal of Product & Brand

Management, 21 (5), pp. 341–349.

doi: 10.1108/10610421211253632.

Fasold, R. 1984. Sociolinguistics of Society.

Basil black Well Inc. New York.

Gao, Y., Su, X. And Zhou, L. 2000. Prehandover language attitudes in

Hongkong, Beijing, and Guangzhou

in Limei Wang a & Hans J.

Ladegaard (2010) Language

Attitudes and Gender in China:

Perceptions

Halliday, M.A.K. & R. Hasan translated by

Barori. 1992. Bahasa, Konteks, dan

Teks.: Aspek-Apek Bahasa dalam

Pandangan Semiotik Sosial. Gadjah

Mada University Press.

Hoare, R. 2000. An Integrative approach to

language attitudes and identity in

Brittany. Journal of Sociolinguistics,

(1),73-84

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10

.1111/ 1467-9481.00138/pdf,

Accessed pada 2 September 2018

Ihemere, Kelechukwu Uchechukwu. 2006.

Vol 2 No 3 (2022) : KOMPETENSI : Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa dan Seni

“An Integrated Approach to the

Study of Language Attitudes and

Change in Nigeria: The Case of the

Ikwerre of Port Harcourt City”. In

Selected Proceeding of the 36th

Annual Conference on African

Linguistics, ed. Olaoba F. Arasanyin

and Michael A. Paemberton A, 194-

Somerville, MA: Cascadilla

Proceedings Project.

http://www.lingref.com/cpp/acal/36/

paper1 424.pdf. Diakses 1 September

Kridalakasana, Harimurti. 2001. Kamus

Linguistik. Jakarta: PT Gramedia

Pustaka Utama.

Maricar, Farida. 2016. The Influence

Factors of Ternate Language Shift

in Ternate City. International

Journal of Science and Research

(IJSR). Vol 5 Issue 1, January 2016.

pp. 1756 -1761.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-15

How to Cite

Damopolii, V. L. F. (2022). Language Preference of the Indonesia Economic Subjects’ toward Product Labeling. KOMPETENSI, 2(03), 1218 - 1226. https://doi.org/10.53682/kompetensi.v2i03.4749