Kualitas Layanan Citra dan Kepercayaan Institusi Dalam Memprediksi Praktik Pendidikan Tinggi Berkelanjutan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53682/mk.v6i2.12791Keywords:
image, trust, service quality, higher education sustainabilityAbstract
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengimplementasikan penggunaan metode SERVPERF dalam mengukur kinerja layanan pada sektor lembaga pendidikan tinggi. SERPERF merupakan metode evaluasi kinerja kualitas pelayanan yang menjadi perbaikan dari metode SERVQUAL yang selama ini lebih dikenal. Data dalam penelitian ini menggunakan data primer dimana responden ditarik dari sivitas akademika perguruan tinggi dengan kriteria telah menempuh masa studi minimal 1 tahun (2 semester). Dengan menggunakan structural equation model, hasil penelitian menunjukkan praktek pendidikan tinggi berkelanjutan secara langsung dipengaruhi oleh kualitas layanan, citra institusi, dan komitmen. Sementara itu, kepercayaan ditemukan tidak signifikan sebagai prediktor pendidikan tinggi berkelanjutan. Temuan lainnya menunjukkan adanya peran mediasi yang dilakukan oleh citra institusi dan kepercayaan atas hubungan kualitas layanan dan praktek pendidikan tinggi berkelanjutan. Hasil ini mendemonstrasikan peran citra dan kepercayaan institusi memegang peran krusial dalam mengimplementasikan pendidikan tinggi berkelanjutan. Temuan ini memberikan kontribusi bagi pemangku kepentingan lembaga pendidikan tinggi dalam mengambil kebijakan sehubungan dengan praktek berkelanjutan pada insititusi pendidikan tinggi.
The purpose of this research is to implement the use of the SERVPERF method in measuring service performance in the higher education institution sector. SERPERF is a service quality performance evaluation method that is an improvement of the SERVQUAL method, that has been better known. The data in this study used primary data where respondents were drawn from the college academic community, with the criteria of having taken a minimum study period of 1 year (2 semesters). Using the structural equation model, the results showed that sustainable higher education practices are directly influenced by service quality, institutional image, and commitment. Meanwhile, trust was found to be insignificant as a predictor of sustainable higher education. Other findings indicate the mediating role played by institutional image and trust in the relationship between service quality and sustainable higher education practices. These results demonstrate the role of institutional image and trust play a crucial role in implementing sustainable higher education. These findings may contribute to the stakeholders of higher education institutions in making policies with respect to sustainable practices in higher education institutions.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, F. (2006). Measuring service quality in higher education: HEdPERF versus SERVPERF. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 24(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500610641543.
Aditia, E., Nengah Tela, I., Saleh, N., & Ilona, D. (2018). Understanding the Behavioral Intention to Use a University Web Portal. 4th Engineering Science and Technology International Conference (ESTIC), 1–5.
Alcaide-Pulido, P., Alves, H., & Gutiérrez-Villar, B. (2017). Development of a model to analyze HEI image: a case based on a private and a public university. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 27(2), 162–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2017.1388330
Akdere, M., Top, M., & Tekingündüz, S. (2018). Examining patient perceptions of service quality in Turkish hospitals: The SERVPERF model. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2018.1427501
Ali, F., Zhou, Y., Hussain, K., Nair, P. K., & Ragavan, N. A. (2016). Does higher education service quality effect student satisfaction, image, and loyalty? A study of international students in Malaysian public universities. Quality Assurance in Education, 24(1), 70–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-02-2014-0008
Alwi, S. F. S., & Kitchen, Philip J. (2014). Projecting corporate brand image and behavioral response in business schools: Cognitive or affective brand attributes?. Journal of Business Research, 67(11), 2324-2336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.06.020.
Buttle, F. (1996). SERVQUAL: review, critique, research agenda. European Journal of Marketing, 30(1), 8–32. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569610105762
Chaudhary S., & Dey A. K. (2021). Influence of student-perceived service quality on sustainability practices of university and student satisfaction. Quality Assurance in Education, 29(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-10-2019-0107
Cronin, J. J., & Taylor, S. A. (1994). SERVPERF versus SERVQUAL: Reconciling performance-based and perceptions-minus-expectations measurement of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 125–131. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252256
Faria, N., & Mendes, L. (2013). Organizational image’s partial mediation role between quality and users’ satisfaction. Service Industries Journal, 33(13–14), 1275–1293. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2013.815733
Fragoso, J. T., & Espinosa, I. L. (2017). Assessment of banking service quality perception using the SERVPERF model. Contaduría y Administración, 62(4), 1294-1316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cya.2017.06.011.
Francioni, B., Curina, I., Dennis, C., Papagiannidis, S., Alamanos, E., Bourlakis, M., & Hegner, S. M. (2021). Does trust play a role when it comes to donations? A comparison of Italian and US higher education institutions. Higher Education, 82(1), 85–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00623-1
Ingaldi, M. K. (2016). Use of the servperf method to evaluate service quality in the transport company. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 7(1), 168-177
Kereh, N. P., Tumiwa, R., & Pandowo, A. (2022). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan dan Kepuasan Pada Loyalitas Pelanggan Pada Nasabah Perbankan di Kabupaten Minahasa Selatan. Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 1(1), 46–56. https://doi.org/10.53682/mk.v1i1.476
Kotler, P., & Armstrong, G. (2023). Principles of Marketing (Global ed., 19th ed.). Pearson.
Latif, K. F., Bunce, L., & Ahmad, M. S. (2021). How can universities improve student loyalty? The roles of university social responsibility, service quality, and “customer” satisfaction and trust. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(4), 815–829. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-11-2020-0524
Lewicka, D. (2022). Building and rebuilding trust in higher education institutions (HEIs). Student’s perspective. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 35(6), 887–915. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-02-2022-0037.
Mamuaya, N., & Pandowo, A. (2020). Determinants of customer satisfaction and its implications on word of mouth in e-commerce industry: case study in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Education (APJME), 3(1), 16-27
Manzoor, S. R., Ho, J. S. Y., & al Mahmud, A. (2021). Revisiting the ‘university image model’ for higher education institutions’ sustainability. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 31(2), 220–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2020.1781736.
Morita, P. P., & Burns, C. M. (2014). Trust tokens in team development. Team Performance Management, 20(1), 39–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-03-2013-0006.
Ozdemir, Y., Kaya, S. K., & Turhan, E. (2020). A scale to measure sustainable campus services in higher education: “Sustainable Service Quality. Journal of Cleaner Production, 245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118839
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.
Rumagit, H., & Pandowo, A. (2020). Pengaruh Kualitas Pelayanan dan Harga Pada Kepuasan Pelanggan di Casey Music Studio. Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 1(2), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.53682/mk.v1i2.627
Schlesinger, W., Cervera, A., & Pérez-Cabañero, C. (2017). Sticking with your university: the importance of satisfaction, trust, image, and shared values. Studies in Higher Education, 42(12), 2178–2194. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1136613
Sultan, P., & Wong, H. Y. (2013). Antecedents and consequences of service quality in a higher education context: A qualitative research approach. Quality Assurance in Education, 21(1), 70–95. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684881311293070
Sumampouw, R., Sumampouw, J., & Pandowo, A. (2022). Pengaruh Electronic Word-of-Mouth terhadap Minat Beli pada Produk Scarlett dengan Kesadaran Merek sebagai Variabel Mediasi. Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 3(2), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.53682/mk.v3i2.4201
Suparjo, S., & Sunarsih, E. S. (2018). The Role of Service Quality and Institutional Image in Establishing Relational Commitment Between Provate Universities and The Students. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 21(3), 1–13.
Teeroovengadum, V., Nunkoo, R., Gronroos, C., Kamalanabhan, T. J., & Seebaluck, A. K. (2019). Higher education service quality, student satisfaction and loyalty: Validating the HESQUAL scale and testing an improved structural model. Quality Assurance in Education, 27(4), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-01-2019-0003
Yousaf, A., Mishra, A., & Bashir, M. (2020). Brand trust, institutional commitment, and their impact on student loyalty: evidence for higher education in India. Studies in Higher Education, 45(4), 878–891. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1558441
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aditya Pandowo, Miryam Lonto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

