Kajian Hukum Mengenai Relevansi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tentang Ambang Batas Pencalonan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden di Indonesia

Authors

  • Agustien Cherly Wereh Universitas Negeri Manado

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53682/jce.v6i2.5110

Keywords:

Threshold , Requirements Elections

Abstract

The holding of the general election for President and Vice President which is held simultaneously but in the implementation of the general election still uses the threshold conditions. The threshold conditions are obtained from the results of the previous election. The Constitutional Court affirmed that the threshold requirement for simultaneous general elections is constitutional. The purpose of the study is to examine the relevance of the Presidential Threshold with simultaneous elections. The research method is normative legal research. The types of data used are primary data and secondary data. From the results of the study, it can be concluded that the Presidential Threshold must follow the development of the general election, namely simultaneous elections and the Presidential Threshold only limiting the people's right to get many presidential and vice presidential candidates.

References

ANSHARI, MIHWAR. n.d. “POLITIK HUKUM PEMILU DI INDONESIA (Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Pasal 22E Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Dan Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2007 Tentang Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum).”

Arman, Zuhdi. 2019. “Analisis Terhadap Pengujian Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 2008 Tentang Pemilihan Umum Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden.” Jurnal Cahaya Keadilan 7(1):264–82.

Arsil, Fitra. 2017. “Stabilitas Sistem Presidensial Indonesia Melalui Pemilihan Umum Serentak Dan Presidential Tresshold.” Jurnal Ketatanegaraan 5.

Firdinal, Ziffany. 2016. “Perubahan Makna Pasal 6A Ayat (2) UUD 1945.” Jurnal Konstitusi 10(4):649–74.

Hariyanto, Ruth Christa Vanesa. 2019. “KEBIJAKAN LEGISLATIF TERBUKA DALAM KETENTUAN AMBANG BATAS PENCALONAN PRESIDEN (STUDI TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 59/PUU-XV/2017).” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum: ALETHEA 3(1):29–42.

HIDAYAT, MUHAMAD. 2006. “PENEGAKAN HUKUM DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PEMILIHAN UMUM DALAM RANGKA MEWUJUDKAN PEMILIHAN UMUM YANG JUJUR DAN ADIL.”

Indonesia, Republik. 2017. “Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilihan Umum.” Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 182.

Lailam, Tanto, and Putri Anggia. 2020. “Pengenyampingan Keadilan Substantif Dalam Penerapan Ambang Batas Sengketa Hasil Pilkada Di Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 17(2):209–22.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud, and M. S. SH. 2021. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Prenada Media.

Nazriyah, Riri. 2011. “Kemandirian Penyelenggara Pemilihan Umum (Kajian Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 81/PUU-IX/2011).” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 18:107–26.

Santie, Yoseph Daniel Ari, Romi Mesra, and Paulus Robert Tuerah. 2020. “Management of Character Education (Analysis on Students at Unima Sociology Education Study Program).” Pp. 184–87 in 3rd International Conference on Social Sciences (ICSS 2020). Vol. 473.

Saputra, Agung Wirya. 2021. “KONSTITUSIONALITAS PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD DALAM PERSPEKTIF PASAL 6A AYAT (2) UUD NRI 1945.”

Published

2022-12-19

How to Cite

Wereh, A. C. (2022). Kajian Hukum Mengenai Relevansi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi tentang Ambang Batas Pencalonan Presiden dan Wakil Presiden di Indonesia. Civic Education: Media Kajian Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 6(2), 91-98. https://doi.org/10.53682/jce.v6i2.5110