Perlindungan Hukum Merek Dagang di Indonesia

Meiske Lasut

doi:10.53682/jce.v6i2.5616

Authors

Meiske Lasut Universitas Negeri Manado

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53682/jce.v6i2.5616

Keywords:

Legal protection , Trademark

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal protection of company trademarks and the legal consequences of counterfeiting trademarks. Marks have an important role in trade traffic for both registered brand owners and consumers to be able to recognize the quality of the products used so that there is a need for protection of the mark. This research is a normative juridical research with an analytical perspective. Trademark protection appears after the mark is registered because UUMIG adheres to a constitutive principle where the right to a mark arises after registration, therefore the use of a mark without rights has legal consequences both civilly in the form of a lawsuit for compensation and criminally in the form of imprisonment and fines. The research results show that legal protection for trademarks in Indonesia and internationally is given after the mark is registered. This also applies to well-known brands for goods and services that are similar or not. The legal consequences of using a mark without rights are civil or criminal. Civil lawsuits for misuse of marks from unauthorized parties can be in the form of material or immaterial compensation, while criminal legal consequences can be in the form of imprisonment and fines.

References

Apeles, Lonto Lexi, Lolong Jefferson Ronal Wenly, and Pangalila Theodorus. 2016. “Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia.” Yogyakarta: Ombak.

FIRDINA M, Priska. 2019. “Pembatalan Merek Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek Dan Indikasi Geografis Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 938 K/Pdt. Sus-HKI/2017.”

Indonesia. 1996. Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1995 Tentang Kepabeanan.

Irwan. Romi Mesra. dkk. 2019. PENGANTAR SOSIOLOGI UMUM: Menelusuri Kajian-Kajian Sosiologi. edited by Zusmelia dan Irwan. Yogyakarta: PENERBIT DEEPUBLISH.

Jasmine, T. Fairuz. 2021. “Analisis Hukum Terhadap Urgensi Pendaftaran Merek Bagi Pelaku Usaha Mikro, Kecil, Dan Menengah (UMKM)(STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 646 K/Pst. Sus-HKI/2021).” Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum 2(3):644–52.

Jonaedi Efendi, S. H. I., S. H. Johnny Ibrahim, and M. M. Se. 2018. Metode Penelitian Hukum: Normatif Dan Empiris. Prenada Media.

Koto, Ismail. 2021. “Kebijakan Hukum Terhadap Perbuatan Penggunaan Merek Yang Sama Pada Pokoknya.” Pp. 42–51 in Seminar Nasional Hukum, Sosial dan Ekonomi. Vol. 1.

LOGO, PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM ATAS PEMBAJAKAN. n.d. “MENURUT PERSPEKTIF HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL INDONESIA.”

Mangowal, Jacklin. 2017. “Perlindungan Hukum Merek Terkenal Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek.” Lex Et Societatis 5(9).

Mesra, Romi, Yummy Jumiati Marsa, and Mardiati Etika Putri. 2021. “Pola Interaksi Pedagang Konsinyasi Dengan Pemilik Warung Di Kecamatan Tondano Selatan, Provinsi Sulawesi Utara.” JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan) 5(3):166–75. doi: 10.36312/jisip.v5i3.2104.

Pangalila, Theodorus. 2013. “Character Education The Future Key for Indonesian Citizens Having Character.” in International Seminar on Civic Education. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Sutedi, Adrian. 2009. “Implikasi Hukum Atas Sumber Pembiayaan Daerah: Dalam Kerangka Otonomi Daerah.”

Tashdieqy, Tammy Fadhly. 2018. “Perlindungan Hak Atas Merek Dagang Dihubungkan Dengan Pasal 3 Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun