Media Sosial dan Pembentukan Opini Publik: Implikasi Hukum terhadap Proses Peradilan yang Adil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53682/jpjsre.v6i1.11857Keywords:
Media Sosial, Opini Publik, Implikasi Hukum, Proses Peradilan, AdilAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis hubungan kompleks antara media sosial pembentukan opini publik dan implikasinya terhadap proses peradilan yang adil dalam konteks hukum kontemporer Menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif berbasis studi literatur penelitian ini mengkaji berbagai sumber ilmiah termasuk jurnal buku dan dokumen hukum yang relevan dengan analisis tematik untuk mengidentifikasi pola dan tren Temuan penelitian mengungkapkan tiga aspek krusial: pertama media sosial telah secara fundamental mengubah dinamika pembentukan opini publik terhadap kasus hukum melalui algoritma dan fenomena pengadilan oleh media sosial ; kedua opini publik yang terbentuk di media sosial memberikan tekanan signifikan terhadap independensi peradilan dengan mempengaruhi perilaku aktor aktor peradilan; dan ketiga sistem hukum di berbagai yurisdiksi telah mengembangkan respons regulatori yang beragam untuk menghadapi tantangan ini Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa diperlukan pendekatan multidimensional yang melibatkan reformasi hukum kerjasama dengan platform digital dan peningkatan literasi digital masyarakat untuk menjaga keseimbangan antara transparansi peradilan kebebasan berekspresi dan integritas sistem hukum di era media sosial < p>
References
Altheide D 2018 Media Logic and the Mediatization of Law Journal of Media Studies 25 3 142 159
Bakshy E Messing S Adamic L A 2020 Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on social media Science 348 6239 1130 1132
Brady W J Crockett M J Van Bavel J J 2023 Emotional contagion in digital media consumption Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120 7 e2207292120
Braun V Clarke V 2012 Thematic analysis In H Cooper Ed APA handbook of research methods in psychology Vol 2 pp 57 71 American Psychological Association
Castells M 2015 Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age Polity Press
Castells M 2019 The Rise of the Network Society 3rd ed Wiley Blackwell
Chen D Wojcik S 2023 AI tools for monitoring public sentiment in high profile legal cases Harvard Journal of Law Technology 36 1 89 124
Chen L Wu Y 2021 The impact of social media on reporting of legal cases International Journal of Communication Law 18 2 215 238
Citron D K Franks M A 2022 Digital harassment and the courts: Understanding the impact on judicial independence Georgetown Law Journal 110 3 487 532
Cohen Almagor R 2022 The limits of free speech in a digital age Oxford University Press
Creswell J W Creswell J D 2018 Research design: Qualitative quantitative and mixed methods approaches 5th ed Sage Publications
Dean M 2018 Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society 3rd ed Sage Publications
Eaglin J M 2022 Cognitive contamination and judicial decision making in the digital age California Law Review 110 2 301 349
Garland D 2019 The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society 2nd ed Oxford University Press
Gibson J L Nelson M J 2021 Social media influence on judicial independence: Evidence from a survey of judges Journal of Law and Courts 9 1 75 103
Gillespie T Aufderheide P 2022 Co regulation of digital platforms: Design and implementation MIT Press
Hasell A Weeks B E 2021 Emotional dynamics in digital discussions of legal cases Journal of Communication 71 3 497 521
Helberger N Pierson J Poell T 2023 Dynamic governance of social media platforms: Regulatory challenges and opportunities Information Communication Society 26 8 1292 1310
Hong S Szmer J 2022 Quantifying social media attention to high profile legal cases Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 19 2 387 418
Johnston J Breit R 2018 Towards a framework for responding to social media justice campaigns in Australian courts Journal of Judicial Administration 28 1 24 46
Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration 2023 National Survey on Judicial Security and Social Media Administrative Office of the U S Courts
Judicial Conference of the United States 2022 Guidelines for managing cases with significant social media attention Administrative Office of the U S Courts
Juwana H 2021 Politisasi proses hukum melalui media sosial: Tantangan bagi independensi peradilan Indonesia Jurnal Hukum Pembangunan 51 3 578 597
Kahneman D 2021 Noise: A flaw in human judgment Little Brown Spark
Keller D Leerssen P 2021 Social media regulation around the world: A comparative analysis Stanford Law School
Klein D E Mitchell G 2020 Implicit bias in judicial decision making: An experimental study of social media exposure Journal of Law and Human Behavior 44 6 482 501
Lessig L 2019 Code: And other laws of cyberspace 3rd ed Basic Books
Leveson B 2019 Justice in the age of social media British Journal of Criminology 59 4 765 783
Leveson B 2022 The Future of Justice in a Digital Age Oxford University Press
Lewandowsky S Ecker U K H Cook J 2022 Information asymmetry in the digital public sphere Journal of Communication 72 4 551 577
Lincoln Y S Guba E G 1985 Naturalistic inquiry Sage Publications
Martin K Petkova B 2023 Empirical assessment of social media influence on criminal case outcomes Stanford Law Review 75 3 725 779
Mueller B Schmidt V 2022 Prosecutorial decision making in the social media age: A survey of prosecutor attitudes Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 112 2 305 351
Pariser E 2021 The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think Revised ed Penguin Books
Park C S Kaye B K 2020 Expanding the filter bubble: Social media use and political polarization Information Communication Society 23 5 651 674
Rahman A Hartono B 2023 Polarisasi pendapat publik dalam kasus kasus hukum kontroversial di media sosial Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia 12 2 158 172
Reza A Prakoso D 2021 Pengaruh pemberitaan media sosial terhadap putusan hakim di Indonesia: Analisis kasus 2015 2020 Jurnal Yudisial 14 2 167 188
Richards N M King J H 2019 The privacy paradox and the lessons of the right to be forgotten litigation European Data Protection Law Review 5 1 11 27
Rowbottom J 2020 Contempt of court in the age of social media Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 40 3 517 544
Smith J Brown A 2021 Legal implications of viral justice campaigns Harvard Law Review 134 7 2495 2541
Snyder H 2019 Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines Journal of Business Research 104 333 339
Solove D J 2018 Understanding privacy 2nd ed Harvard University Press
Sunstein C R 2023 Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media 2nd ed Princeton University Press
Susskind R 2020 Online Courts and the Future of Justice Oxford University Press
Tanenbaum E Silver D 2023 The efficacy of gag orders in the social media era: An empirical assessment Yale Law Journal 132 5 1287 1349
Thompson J Garcia R 2022 Comparative analysis of social media regulation in different legal systems International Journal of Communication Law 19 3 312 335
Valenzuela S Correa T Gil de Z iga H 2021 Social media campaigns and public attention to legal cases: A longitudinal analysis Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 26 3 135 155
Van Dijck J Poell T 2023 The platform society: Public values in a connective world 2nd ed Oxford University Press
Vosoughi S Roy D Aral S 2018 The spread of true and false news online Science 359 6380 1146 1151
Widodo J 2022 UU ITE dan perlindungan proses peradilan di era digital Jurnal Konstitusi 19 1 45 67
Wright R F Levine K 2021 The impact of social media on pretrial detention decisions Duke Law Journal 70 4 775 835
Zhao Y Chen K 2021 Legal frameworks for social media regulation: A comparative study Cambridge University Press
Zittrain J 2018 The future of the internet and how to stop it 2nd ed Yale University Press
