Media Sosial dan Pembentukan Opini Publik: Implikasi Hukum terhadap Proses Peradilan yang Adil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53682/jpjsre.v6i1.11857Keywords:
Media Sosial, Opini Publik, Implikasi Hukum, Proses Peradilan, AdilAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis hubungan kompleks antara media sosial, pembentukan opini publik, dan implikasinya terhadap proses peradilan yang adil dalam konteks hukum kontemporer. Menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif berbasis studi literatur, penelitian ini mengkaji berbagai sumber ilmiah termasuk jurnal, buku, dan dokumen hukum yang relevan, dengan analisis tematik untuk mengidentifikasi pola dan tren. Temuan penelitian mengungkapkan tiga aspek krusial: pertama, media sosial telah secara fundamental mengubah dinamika pembentukan opini publik terhadap kasus hukum melalui algoritma dan fenomena "pengadilan oleh media sosial"; kedua, opini publik yang terbentuk di media sosial memberikan tekanan signifikan terhadap independensi peradilan dengan mempengaruhi perilaku aktor-aktor peradilan; dan ketiga, sistem hukum di berbagai yurisdiksi telah mengembangkan respons regulatori yang beragam untuk menghadapi tantangan ini. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa diperlukan pendekatan multidimensional yang melibatkan reformasi hukum, kerjasama dengan platform digital, dan peningkatan literasi digital masyarakat untuk menjaga keseimbangan antara transparansi peradilan, kebebasan berekspresi, dan integritas sistem hukum di era media sosial.
References
Altheide, D. (2018). Media Logic and the Mediatization of Law. Journal of Media Studies, 25(3), 142-159.
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. A. (2020). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on social media. Science, 348(6239), 1130-1132.
Brady, W. J., Crockett, M. J., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2023). Emotional contagion in digital media consumption. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(7), e2207292120.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper (Ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 57-71). American Psychological Association.
Castells, M. (2015). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. Polity Press.
Castells, M. (2019). The Rise of the Network Society (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Chen, D., & Wojcik, S. (2023). AI tools for monitoring public sentiment in high-profile legal cases. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 36(1), 89-124.
Chen, L., & Wu, Y. (2021). The impact of social media on reporting of legal cases. International Journal of Communication Law, 18(2), 215-238.
Citron, D. K., & Franks, M. A. (2022). Digital harassment and the courts: Understanding the impact on judicial independence. Georgetown Law Journal, 110(3), 487-532.
Cohen-Almagor, R. (2022). The limits of free speech in a digital age. Oxford University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Dean, M. (2018). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Eaglin, J. M. (2022). Cognitive contamination and judicial decision-making in the digital age. California Law Review, 110(2), 301-349.
Garland, D. (2019). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Gibson, J. L., & Nelson, M. J. (2021). Social media influence on judicial independence: Evidence from a survey of judges. Journal of Law and Courts, 9(1), 75-103.
Gillespie, T., & Aufderheide, P. (2022). Co-regulation of digital platforms: Design and implementation. MIT Press.
Hasell, A., & Weeks, B. E. (2021). Emotional dynamics in digital discussions of legal cases. Journal of Communication, 71(3), 497-521.
Helberger, N., Pierson, J., & Poell, T. (2023). Dynamic governance of social media platforms: Regulatory challenges and opportunities. Information, Communication & Society, 26(8), 1292-1310.
Hong, S., & Szmer, J. (2022). Quantifying social media attention to high-profile legal cases. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 19(2), 387-418.
Johnston, J., & Breit, R. (2018). Towards a framework for responding to social media justice campaigns in Australian courts. Journal of Judicial Administration, 28(1), 24-46.
Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration. (2023). National Survey on Judicial Security and Social Media. Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.
Judicial Conference of the United States. (2022). Guidelines for managing cases with significant social media attention. Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts.
Juwana, H. (2021). Politisasi proses hukum melalui media sosial: Tantangan bagi independensi peradilan Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 51(3), 578-597.
Kahneman, D. (2021). Noise: A flaw in human judgment. Little, Brown Spark.
Keller, D., & Leerssen, P. (2021). Social media regulation around the world: A comparative analysis. Stanford Law School.
Klein, D. E., & Mitchell, G. (2020). Implicit bias in judicial decision-making: An experimental study of social media exposure. Journal of Law and Human Behavior, 44(6), 482-501.
Lessig, L. (2019). Code: And other laws of cyberspace (3rd ed.). Basic Books.
Leveson, B. (2019). Justice in the age of social media. British Journal of Criminology, 59(4), 765-783.
Leveson, B. (2022). The Future of Justice in a Digital Age. Oxford University Press.
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & Cook, J. (2022). Information asymmetry in the digital public sphere. Journal of Communication, 72(4), 551-577.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Martin, K., & Petkova, B. (2023). Empirical assessment of social media influence on criminal case outcomes. Stanford Law Review, 75(3), 725-779.
Mueller, B., & Schmidt, V. (2022). Prosecutorial decision-making in the social media age: A survey of prosecutor attitudes. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 112(2), 305-351.
Pariser, E. (2021). The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think (Revised ed.). Penguin Books.
Park, C. S., & Kaye, B. K. (2020). Expanding the filter bubble: Social media use and political polarization. Information, Communication & Society, 23(5), 651-674.
Rahman, A., & Hartono, B. (2023). Polarisasi pendapat publik dalam kasus-kasus hukum kontroversial di media sosial. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 12(2), 158-172.
Reza, A., & Prakoso, D. (2021). Pengaruh pemberitaan media sosial terhadap putusan hakim di Indonesia: Analisis kasus 2015-2020. Jurnal Yudisial, 14(2), 167-188.
Richards, N. M., & King, J. H. (2019). The privacy paradox and the lessons of the "right to be forgotten" litigation. European Data Protection Law Review, 5(1), 11-27.
Rowbottom, J. (2020). Contempt of court in the age of social media. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 40(3), 517-544.
Smith, J., & Brown, A. (2021). Legal implications of viral justice campaigns. Harvard Law Review, 134(7), 2495-2541.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339.
Solove, D. J. (2018). Understanding privacy (2nd ed.). Harvard University Press.
Sunstein, C. R. (2023). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
Susskind, R. (2020). Online Courts and the Future of Justice. Oxford University Press.
Tanenbaum, E., & Silver, D. (2023). The efficacy of gag orders in the social media era: An empirical assessment. Yale Law Journal, 132(5), 1287-1349.
Thompson, J., & Garcia, R. (2022). Comparative analysis of social media regulation in different legal systems. International Journal of Communication Law, 19(3), 312-335.
Valenzuela, S., Correa, T., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2021). Social media campaigns and public attention to legal cases: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 26(3), 135-155.
Van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2023). The platform society: Public values in a connective world (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151.
Widodo, J. (2022). UU ITE dan perlindungan proses peradilan di era digital. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(1), 45-67.
Wright, R. F., & Levine, K. (2021). The impact of social media on pretrial detention decisions. Duke Law Journal, 70(4), 775-835.
Zhao, Y., & Chen, K. (2021). Legal frameworks for social media regulation: A comparative study. Cambridge University Press.
Zittrain, J. (2018). The future of the internet and how to stop it (2nd ed.). Yale University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JURNAL PARADIGMA : Journal of Sociology Research and Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
