Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran IPS Berbasis Deep Learning: Pendekatan Holistik untuk Integrasi Teknologi dalam Kelas

Authors

  • Helmiyanti Helmiyanti MTsN 6 Padang Pariaman
  • Zelhendri Zen Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Fetri Yeni J Universitas Negeri Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53682/20jgwq98

Keywords:

Pembelajaran Mendalam, Pendidikan Ilmu Sosial, Arsitektur CNN-LSTM, Integrasi Teknologi, Pedagogi Berbasis Penyelidikan

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan kerangka kerja komprehensif untuk mengintegrasikan teknologi pembelajaran mendalam, khususnya dalam pedagogi pendidikan ilmu sosial, sekaligus menjawab beragam kebutuhan lingkungan kelas modern. Metodologi tinjauan pustaka sistematis yang mengikuti pedoman PRISMA digunakan, dengan melakukan penelusuran komprehensif di seluruh basis data Web of Science, Scopus, ERIC, dan Google Scholar untuk studi-studi relevan yang diterbitkan antara tahun 2014 dan 2024. Teknik analisis konten kualitatif dan sintesis tematik digunakan untuk mengkaji penelitian yang ada terkait integrasi teknologi pembelajaran mendalam dalam konteks pendidikan, dengan perhatian khusus pada kerangka kerja pedagogis, tantangan implementasi, dan hasil belajar siswa. Analisis ini mengungkapkan bahwa arsitektur CNN-LSTM hibrida menunjukkan kemampuan prediktif yang unggul untuk aplikasi pendidikan, mencapai akurasi lebih dari 95% dalam meramalkan hasil belajar siswa. Namun, integrasi yang sukses membutuhkan pengembangan profesional yang komprehensif yang mencakup kompetensi teknis dan transformasi pedagogis, di samping penyelarasan eksplisit dengan kerangka kerja pedagogis berbasis inkuiri yang menjadi ciri khas pengajaran ilmu sosial yang efektif. Penelitian ini mengidentifikasi kesenjangan yang signifikan antara kemampuan teknologi dan implementasi pedagogis, terutama terkait keyakinan guru dan struktur dukungan institusional.

References

Abedi, A. (2024). Technology integration barriers and teacher pedagogical beliefs in social studies classrooms. Journal of Educational Technology Research.

Abedi, A., Prestridge, S., & Hodge, S. (2023). First and second-order barriers to technology integration: A systematic review of current research. Educational Technology & Society, 26(2), 156-171.

Aljaloud, A., Billingsley, W., & Kwan, P. (2022). Prediction of student academic performance using CNN-LSTM model in learning management systems. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 15(4), 478-490.

Amir, M. (2023). Systematic review of teacher professional development programs for digital learning integration. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1-24.

Arya, R., Kumar, S., & Singh, P. (2024). Integrated CNN-LSTM methodology for early prediction of student performance in higher education contexts. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100142.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.

Bathaei, A., & Štreimikienė, D. (2023). A systematic literature review using SALSA framework: Renewable energy and economic growth. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 178, 113245.

Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4-16.

Brophy, J., Alleman, J., & Knighton, B. (2009). Inside the social studies classroom. Routledge.

Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Harvard University Press.

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.

Crompton, H., Burke, D., Jordan, K., & Wilson, S. W. G. (2023). Learning with technology during emergencies: A systematic review of K-12 education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1351-1375.

Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms, 1890-1990 (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.

Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Harvard University Press.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.

Denton, D. W. (2017). Enhancing instruction through constructivism, cooperative learning, and cloud computing. TechTrends, 61(5), 437-445.

Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199.

Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. D.C. Heath & Company.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.

Dilling, F., Fest, A., Pielsticker, F., & Witzke, I. (2024). Teacher professional development for digital learning integration: A systematic review of effective components. Education Sciences, 14(3), 245.

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115.

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit.

Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61.

Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25-39.

Francom, G. M. (2020). Barriers to technology integration: A time-series survey study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(1), 1-16.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.

Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.

Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. Basic Books.

Garone, A., Pynoo, B., Tondeur, J., Cocquyt, C., Vanslambrouck, S., Bruggeman, B., & Struyf, E. (2022). Clustering university teaching staff through TPACK: Implications for the design of professional development programs. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(2), 627-651.

Goodlad, J. I. (1984). A place called school: Prospects for the future. McGraw-Hill.

Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching, 8(3), 381-391.

Gutmann, A. (1999). Democratic education (Rev. ed.). Princeton University Press.

Hashim, H., & Bozkurt, A. (2024). AI-powered personalized learning solutions: A systematic literature review on gaps and competencies. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(1), 89-118.

Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735-1780.

Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.

Kerimbayev, N., Nurym, N., Akramova, A., & Abdykarimova, S. (2023). Virtual reality in STEM education: A systematic literature review using PRISMA. Education and Information Technologies, 28(10), 12875-12901.

Khan, M. A., Addas, A., Alorf, A., & Khurram, S. (2024). Deep Learning-enhanced AI platforms for academic performance improvement: A comparative study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100198.

Kilinc, E. (2013). Technology integration barriers in social studies education: A survey of middle school teachers. Contemporary Educational Technology, 4(4), 248-264.

King, M. B., Newmann, F. M., & Carmichael, D. L. (2009). Authentic intellectual work: Common standards for teaching social studies. Social Studies Review, 48(1), 43-58.

Kravik, S., Holm, M. E., & Dalland, C. P. (2022). Teachers' perspectives on technology integration in social studies: Barriers and enablers. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 66(5), 812-828.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.

Lim, J. H., & Kumar, A. (2024). Systematic literature review using SPIDER criteria for qualitative educational research. Review of Educational Research, 94(2), 245-268.

Mengist, W., Soromessa, T., & Legese, G. (2020). Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research. MethodsX, 7, 100777.

Mezirow, J. (1997). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 74, 5-12.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.

Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097.

Moran, J., Ferdig, R. E., Pearson, P. D., Wardrop, J., & Blomeyer, R. L. (2023). Technology and reading performance in the middle-school grades: A meta-analysis with recommendations for policy and practice. Journal of Literacy Research, 55(1), 5-32.

National Council for the Social Studies. (2013). The College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Social Studies State Standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K-12 civics, economics, geography, and history. NCSS.

Newmann, F. M., Marks, H. M., & Gamoran, A. (1996). Authentic pedagogy and student performance. American Journal of Education, 104(4), 280-312.

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71.

Pappa, D., Georgiou, Y., & Pittich, D. (2024). Teachers' barriers and needs for technology integration in primary and secondary education: A systematic review. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 33(1), 87-105.

Pea, R. D. (1985). Beyond amplification: Using the computer to reorganize mental functioning. Educational Psychologist, 20(4), 167-182.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.

Sackstein, S., Spark, L., & Jenkins, A. (2023). Technology integration framework for social studies education: Intersections of content, pedagogy, and technology. Journal of Social Studies Research, 47(3), 234-252.

Saye, J. W., & Social Studies Inquiry Research Collaborative. (2013). Authentic pedagogy: Its presence in social studies classrooms and relationship to student performance on state-mandated tests. Theory & Research in Social Education, 41(1), 89-132.

Seaton, C., Johnson, L., & Smith, K. (2024). Sustained professional development for technology integration: A longitudinal study of teacher change. Professional Development in Education, 50(2), 312-329.

Shadiev, R., Liu, T., & Hwang, W. Y. (2024). Review of research on technology-enhanced language learning using systematic review methodology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(1-2), 1-45.

Shute, V. J., & Zapata-Rivera, D. (2012). Adaptive educational systems. In P. Durlach & A. Lesgold (Eds.), Adaptive technologies for training and education (pp. 7-27). Cambridge University Press.

Strielkowski, W., Tumanyan, Y., & Kalyugina, S. (2025). AI-powered adaptive learning technologies in sustainable education transformation across diverse learning environments. Sustainability, 17(1), 142.

Stupurienė, G., & Gülbahar, Y. (2022). Development of computational thinking and digital competence: Teachers' perspectives on barriers and support needs. Informatics in Education, 21(2), 393-414.

Swan, K., Lee, J., & Grant, S. G. (2014). The College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Social Studies State Standards: An introduction for social studies teachers. Social Education, 78(5), 232-235.

Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wang, Y., Liu, Q., Chen, W., Wang, Q., & Stein, D. (2024). Deep Learning applications for educational outcome prediction: A comprehensive review of CNN-LSTM architectures. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 17, 245-262.

Westheimer, J., & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of citizen? The politics of educating for democracy. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 237-269.

Xu, S., & Stefaniak, J. (2023). Pre-service teachers' technology integration intentions: The role of pedagogical beliefs and TPACK. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 39(2), 78-94.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.

Published

2025-12-21

How to Cite

Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran IPS Berbasis Deep Learning: Pendekatan Holistik untuk Integrasi Teknologi dalam Kelas. (2025). JURNAL PARADIGMA : Journal of Sociology Research and Education, 6(2), 1326-1345. https://doi.org/10.53682/20jgwq98