AN ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH NATIONAL EXAM AND ENGLISH TEACHERS PERCEPTION USING BLOOM S REVISED TAXONOMY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53682/eclue.v8i1.1991Keywords:
Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy, English, 2015/2016 National Exam, English Teachers’ Perception, Cognitive Domain, Test.Abstract
This study was conducted in the purpose of revealing the cognitive domains of Bloom s Revised Taxonomy in 2015 2016 English National Exam for senior high school level and also finding out English teachers perception on the result of 2015 2016 English National Exam questions for senior high school level Furthermore this study is classified as a descriptive study for it analyzed questions used in National Exam and this did not deal with numerical data The research investigated the cognitive domain used in the National Exam s questions based on the revised form of Bloom Taxonomy In addition quantitative method in this research was used to support the qualitative one This is to know the percentage of using cognitive domains in the questions This also aims at deciding the most frequent or dominant level applied in the questions in accordance with Bloom s Revised Taxonomy Three versions of 2015 2016 English National Exam for senior high school level were chosen from three different programs in senior high school natural science program social science program and language program From each program the researcher took one version Then the questions were grouped based on Bloom s Revised Taxonomy using checklist as instrument In obtaining qualitative data the researcher conducted a semi structured interview and three schools were chosen in Tondano There were six teachers to be interviewed The finding shows that the cognitive domains of Bloom s Revised Taxonomy used in question items of 2015 2016 English National Exam for senior high school level are remembering understanding applying and analyzing levels < p>
References
Alderson Charles J 1995 Language Test Construction and Evaluation Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Anderson L W Krathwohl D R Eds 2001 Taxonomy for Learning Teaching And Assessing: A Revision of Bloom s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Needham Heights MA: Allyn Bacon
Arikunto Suharsimi 1993 Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik Jakarta: Rineka
Baysen E 2006 The Levels of Teacher Questions and Student Answers Kastamonu Journal of Education 14 1 21 28
Bloom Benjamin Krathwol David R and Masia Berteam B 1964 Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Book 2: Taxonomy Doma Londom Longman Publishing Company Inc
Bryman Alan and Robert G Burgess 1994 Analyzing Qualitative Data London: Routledge
Darmer P and Freytag P V eds 1995 F retagsekonomisk unders kningsmetodik Lund: Studentlitteratur pp 252 272
Gronlund Norman E 1976 Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching New York: Macmillan Publishing Co In University of Illinois
Miles Matthew B Michael Huberman 1992 Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber Tentang Metode Metode Baru Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia UI Press
Nawawi H Hadari Prof Dr 1993 Metode Penelitian Bidang Sosial Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press
Rashid Z A Sambasivan M Rahman A A 2004 The influence of organizational culture on attitudes toward organizational change Leadership organization development Journal
Sobur Alex 2003 Psikologi Umum dalam Lintasan Sejarah First Edition Bandung: CV Pustaka Setia
Sudijono Anas 2010 Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan Jakarta: Rajawali Press
Susanti R Pangestuti I R D 2010 Analisis Faktor faktor yang berpengaruh terhadap nilai perusahaan Studi kasus pada perusahaan go public yang listed tahun 2005 2008 Doctoral dissertation Universitas Diponegoro
Undang Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Sistem Pendidikan Nasional Depdikbud
Wardiana Uswah 2004 Psikologi Umum Jakarta : PT Bina Ilmu
Yilmaz H Sunbul A M 2000 Planing and Evaluation in Instruction Konya: Mikr Printing Distribution
