Comparative Language Of English And Mongondow (A Phonological Analysis)

Authors

  • Fitri Posuma Universitas Negeri Manado
  • Jeni Posumah UNIVERSITAS NEGERI MANADO
  • Meity Muntuuntu UNIVERSITAS NEGERI MANADO

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36582/jotell.v4i1.11332

Abstract

This study conducted a phonological analysis comparing the vowel and consonant systems of English and Mongondow, a regional language spoken in North Sulawesi, Indonesia. The study aimed to identify similarities and differences in the phonological structure of the two languages, focusing on vowel and consonant phonemes. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and observations with five native Mongondow speakers who are also English language learners. The results show that Mongondow has five vowel phonemes (A, I, U, E, O) and 17 consonant phonemes, while English has 12 pure vowels (including 8 diphthongs) and 24 consonants. These two languages have similarities in the classification of consonants based on place and manner of articulation, as well as voicing. However, Mongondow has a simpler vowel system and fewer consonant phonemes compared to English. In addition, Mongondow has unique consonant sounds, such as the alveolar trill /r/, which is rarely found in English. This study highlights the challenges faced by Mongondow speakers in pronouncing certain English sounds due to the influence of their mother tongue. The results of this study contribute to a better understanding of the phonological systems of both languages and provide insights for language learners and educators in addressing pronunciation difficulties. This research underscores the importance of phonological awareness in language learning and teaching, especially in multilingual contexts. The study concludes that understanding the phonological differences between English and Mongondow can help learners overcome pronunciation challenges and improve their language proficiency.

References

Liando, N. V. F., & Lumettu, R. (2017). Students’ Personal Initiative towards their Speaking Performance. International Education Studies, 10(8), 21.

Mogea, T. (2019). The Effectiveness of Question and Answer Technique in Teaching Reading Comprehension at SMP Negeri 3 Ratahan. Journal of Educational Method and Technology, Volume 2 N.

Rini, J. E. (2014). English in Indonesia: Its position among other languages in Indonesia. Beyond Words, 2(2), 19–39.

Wiese, R. (2006). Phonology: Overview. Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, December 2006, 562–564.

Liando, N. V., Tatipang, D. P., & Lengkoan, F. (2022). A study of translanguaging practices in an EFL classroom in Indonesian context: A multilingual concept. Research and Innovation in Language Learning, 5(2), 167-185.

Renyaan, M. M., Rettob, A., & Maukar, M. (2022). THE CORRELATION BETWEEN SMARTPHONE USE AND READING ACTIVITIES OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS. SoCul: International Journal of Research in Social Cultural Issues, 2(3), 602-609.

Pinontoan, K. A., Pelenkahu, N., & Muntuuntu, M. (2022). USING ENGLISH LANGUAGE SPEECH ASSISTANT (ELSA) SPEAK APPLICATION) TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’OF SMP KATOLIK ST. JOHANIS LAIKIT PRONUNCIATION ABILITY. JoTELL: Journal of Teaching English, Linguistics, and Literature, 1(11), 1227-1237.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-12

How to Cite

Posuma, F., Posumah, J., & Muntuuntu, M. (2025). Comparative Language Of English And Mongondow (A Phonological Analysis). JoTELL : Journal of Teaching English, Linguistics, and Literature, 4(1), 1769–1785. https://doi.org/10.36582/jotell.v4i1.11332