Peer Review Process

All the manuscripts submitted are read by the editorial staff. Those manuscripts are rejected if they did not meet journal criteria. Manuscripts evaluated to be potential and appropriate are sent to reviewers. All manuscripts are reviewed by two peer reviewers with double blind review system, so there is no contact between parties.

The peer review process will consider the following:

Ethics: The author has ensured research work and publication ethics.

Originality: plagiarism checking by Turnitin application service is carried out at the submission stage. The manuscript will automatically rejected if the result is over 30%.

Paper relevance to the scope of the journal.

Novelty, objectivity and scientific impact.

The theoretical framework and research gap are is presented and explained.

Research methods are appropriate and presented.

Results are presented and discussed.

References must be comprehensive and uniform with the specified format, namely APA and Mendeley

Decision:

The decisions taken by the editors based on the recommendations of reviewers in the form of: rejected, require major/minor revision, or accepted. 

Rejected article:

Editors will engage other reviewers if the recommendations are contradictory. The editor-in-chief makes the final decision.