Analysis of the Influence of Visual, Auditory, and Kinesthetic Learning Styles on Academic Achievement of Middle School Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53682/jpjsre.v5i2.10508Keywords:
Visual Learning Styles, Auditory Learning Styles, Kinesthetic Learning Styles, Academic Achievement, Middle School Students, Academic Achievement, Middle School StudentsAbstract
This study aims to analyze the influence of visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learning styles on the academic achievement of junior high school students. The research method used is a qualitative approach with a literature review. Data were collected through searching for scientific articles in various academic databases. Data analysis was carried out using a qualitative meta-synthesis approach. The results of the study showed that junior high school students have a variety of learning styles, with a dominance of visual learning styles (45%), auditory (30%), and kinesthetic (25%). Students with visual learning styles excel in subjects involving visual representation, while auditory students excel in language and music subjects. Kinesthetic students show the best performance in practical subjects. Furthermore, the study revealed a complex interaction between learning styles that affect students' academic achievement. The implication of this finding is the importance of developing adaptive learning strategies to accommodate the diversity of students' learning styles.
References
Anderson, L. W., & Thompson, J. (2020). Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice in Modern Education. Educational Research Quarterly.
Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2021). Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications.
DePorter, B., & Hernacki, M. (2016). Quantum Learning: Unleashing the Genius in You. Dell Publishing.
Fleming, N. D., & Baume, D. (2019). Learning Styles Again: VARKing up the right tree! Educational Developments.
Gardner, H., & Davies, K. (2017). Multiple Intelligences and Learning Styles: New Horizons. Basic Books.
Hart, C. (2020). Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Research Imagination. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2018). Learning Styles and Learning Spaces: Enhancing Experiential Learning in Higher Education. Academy of Management Learning & Education.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2016). The Constructivist Credo. Routledge.
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2022). Designing Qualitative Research. SAGE Publications.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2019). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLOS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097.
Noble, H., & Smith, J. (2018). Reviewing the Literature: Choosing a Review Design. Evidence-Based Nursing, 21(2), 39-41.
Rahman, S., Yasin, R. M., Mustaffa, L. M., & Amin, W. A. (2018). The Impact of Learning Styles on Academic Achievement: A Study of Secondary School Students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 11(3), 177-190.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 JURNAL PARADIGMA : Journal of Sociology Research and Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.