Inovasi Pengelolaan Kelas di Era Digital: Integrasi Teknologi dan Pendekatan Humanistik dalam Pengembangan Lingkungan Belajar yang Adaptif dan Kolaboratif

Fadhilah Haswenova; Neviyarni S

doi:10.53682/jpjsre.v5i2.10512

Authors

Fadhilah Haswenova SMK N 1 Padang Gelugur
Neviyarni S Universitas Negeri Padang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53682/jpjsre.v5i2.10512

Keywords:

Lingkungan Belajar Kondusif, Pengelolaan Kelas, Keterlibatan Siswa, Dinamika Kelas, Interaksi Guru-Siswa

Abstract

Menciptakan lingkungan belajar yang kondusif sangat penting untuk mengoptimalkan keterlibatan siswa, motivasi, dan kesuksesan akademik secara keseluruhan. Penelitian ini menyelidiki strategi pengelolaan kelas yang berkontribusi pada lingkungan tersebut, dengan meneliti bagaimana interaksi guru-siswa, rutinitas yang terstruktur, dan penguatan positif dapat mendukung suasana belajar yang kondusif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi praktik pengelolaan kelas yang efektif yang dapat memenuhi kebutuhan siswa yang beragam dan mempromosikan iklim belajar yang harmonis. Dengan pendekatan metode campuran, penelitian ini menggunakan pengumpulan data kualitatif dan kuantitatif, termasuk observasi kelas, wawancara guru, dan kuesioner siswa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kelas dengan rutinitas konsisten, ekspektasi yang jelas, dan fokus pada interaksi positif menghasilkan tingkat keterlibatan siswa yang lebih tinggi dan tingkat gangguan yang lebih rendah. Selain itu, guru yang menyesuaikan strategi pengelolaan untuk mengakomodasi perbedaan individu mengalami peningkatan partisipasi dan hasil belajar yang lebih baik. Temuan ini menekankan pentingnya pengelolaan kelas yang terstruktur dalam menciptakan lingkungan belajar yang kondusif, serta menunjukkan bahwa pelatihan berkelanjutan dan praktik reflektif bagi pendidik dapat meningkatkan dinamika kelas dan kesuksesan siswa.

References

Bowers, A. J. (2018). The role of classroom environment in student success. Educational Researcher.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Brady, L., & Kennedy, K. (2021). Curriculum construction. Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Brookhart, S. M. (2017). How to give effective feedback to your students. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2020). School leadership and management. London, UK: Sage Publications.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2020). Developing, improving, and sustaining schools through the dynamic model of educational effectiveness. New York, NY: Routledge.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.

Dufresne, R. J., & McDuff, P. (2018). Classroom management: A technological approach. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(3), 367-380.

Emmer, E. T., & Evertson, C. M. (2013). Classroom management for middle and high school teachers (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.

Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.

Fullan, M. (2013). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Fullan, M. (2019). The new meaning of educational change. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

Gutek, G. L. (2018). Philosophical and ideological voices in education. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Hamari, J. (2017). Gamification and motivation in education: The role of the facilitator. Journal of Educational Technology.

Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: Maximizing impact on learning. New York, NY: Routledge.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.

Hill, N. E., & Tyson, D. F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: A meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 740-763.

Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.

Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133.

Kraft, M. A., Blazar, D., & Hogan, D. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547-588.

Marzano, R. J. (2003). Classroom management that works: Research-based strategies for every teacher. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2020). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues. Boston, MA: Pearson.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Roeser, R. W., Eccles, J. S., & Sameroff, A. J. (2000). School as a context of early adolescents’ academic and social-emotional development: A summary of research findings. The Elementary School Journal, 100(5), 443-471.

Simonsen, B., Fairbanks, S., Briesch, A., Myers, D., & Sugai, G. (2008). Evidence-based practices in classroom management: Considerations for research to practice. Education and Treatment of Children, 31(3), 351-380.

Sugiyono. (2021). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung, Indonesia: Alfabeta.

Suldo, S. M., & Shaunessy, E. (2007). Relationships among stress, coping, and mental health in high-achieving high school students. Psychology in the Schools, 44(1), 51-70.

Tilaar, H. A. R. (2019). Pendidikan, kebudayaan, dan masyarakat. Jakarta, Indonesia: Grasindo.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: ASCD.

Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555-575.

Tschannen-Moran, M., & McMaster, P. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy: Four professional development formats and their relationship to self-efficacy and implementation of a new teaching strategy. The Elementary School Journal, 110(2), 228-245.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Weinstein, C. S. (2018). Classroom organization and management (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.