The Use of Trainer Kits to Improve Learning Outcomes of Electrical Lighting Installation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53682/edunitro.v3i1.5488Keywords:
trainer kits, learning outcomes, electrical lighting installations, classroom action researchAbstract
Learning outcomes are mental processes that lead to mastery of knowledge, skills, habits, or attitudes that are acquired, stored, and implemented by causing permanent behavior. Therefore, to improve student learning outcomes, using the Class Action Research (CAR) method, the Kemis and McTaggart model design uses a spiral system that includes several cycles. Each cycle consists of the following stages: (i) Planning, (ii) Implementation and Observation, and (iii) Reflection. The Classroom Action Research method results show that teachers can use the trainer kit as a learning medium and operate it according to the time that has been arranged. Some influential students who become more knowledgeable in studying Electrical Lighting Installation materials using a trainer kit have also improved learning outcomes. Some already know and understand and can even practice it well because students need guidance from subject teachers and facilities from majors and schools for better practice. Through learning with home lighting installation trainers in electrical lighting installations, students can improve learning outcomes for class XI SMK Negeri 2 Manado in the 2021/2022 academic year in the sub-competence of installing and connecting installation systems.
References
Afriyuni Yonanada, D. (2017). Improvement of Social Science Learning Result Using Index Card Match Learning Model. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Education and Training (ICET 2017), 97–100. https://doi.org/10.2991/icet-17.2017.14
Isnur Haryudo, S., Rijanto, T., Baskoro, F., & Artikel Abstrak, I. (2021). Implementation of Trainer Kits in Project-Based Learning to Improve Critical Thinking, Motivation, and Competency of Electrical Engineering Students. JURNAL PENDIDIKAN: TEORI, PENELITIAN, DAN PENGEMBANGAN, 6(12), 1947–1952. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v6i12.15179
Kim, J. (2020). Learning and Teaching Online During Covid-19: Experiences of Student Teachers in an Early Childhood Education Practicum. International Journal of Early Childhood, 52(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-020-00272-6
Kunlasomboon, N., Wongwanich, S., & Suwanmonkha, S. (2015). Research and Development of Classroom Action Research Process to Enhance School Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 171, 1315–1324. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.248
Lestiyanawati, R. (2020). The Strategies and Problems Faced by Indonesian Teachers in Conducting e-learning during COVID-19 Outbreak. CLLiENT (Culture, Literature, Linguistics, and English Teaching), 2(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.32699/cllient.v2i1.1271
Mamahit, C. E. J. (2019). ANALYSIS TO THE INFLUENCE OF TIME MANAGEMENT AND TEACHING MOTIVATION ON LECTURER’S PERFORMANCE. Jurnal MANAJERIAL, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/manajerial.v18i1.11002
Mamahit, C. J. (2021). Blended Model of Distance Learning: Does It Effective? Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Kejuruan, 3(4), 176–186. https://doi.org/10.24036/jptk.v3i4.15223
Meesuk, P., Sramoon, B., & Wongrugsa, A. (2020). Classroom Action Research-based Instruction: The Sustainable Teacher Professional Development Strategy. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 22(1), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2020-0008
Mettetal, G. (2012). The What, Why and How of Classroom Action Research. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 2(1 SE-Articles), 6–13. https://scholarworks.iu.edu/journals/index.php/josotl/article/view/1589
Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A. (2022). Teachers’ accounts of learners’ engagement and disaffection in the language classroom. The Language Learning Journal, 50(3), 393–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2020.1800067
Nurtanto, M., Fawaid, M., & Sofyan, H. (2020). Problem Based Learning (PBL) in Industry 4.0: Improving Learning Quality through Character-Based Literacy Learning and Life Career Skill (LL-LCS). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1573(1), 12006. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1573/1/012006
Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Liao, J. Y.-C., Sadik, O., & Ertmer, P. (2018). Evolution of Teachers’ Technology Integration Knowledge, Beliefs, and Practices: How Can We Support Beginning Teachers Use of Technology? Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(4), 282–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2018.1487350
Rasmitadila, Widyasari, Prasetyo, T., Rachmadtullah, R., Samsudin, A., & Aliyyah, R. R. (2021). General teachers’ experience of the Brain’s natural learning systems-based instructional approach in inclusive classroom. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1436a
Singh, J., Steele, K., & Singh, L. (2021). Combining the Best of Online and Face-to-Face Learning: Hybrid and Blended Learning Approach for COVID-19, Post Vaccine, & Post-Pandemic World. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2), 140–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211047865
Sudjana, N. (2010). Penilaian hasil proses belajar mengajar. In Remaja Rosdakarya. PT. Remaja Rosda Karya.
Vershitskaya, E. R., Mikhaylova, A. V, Gilmanshina, S. I., Dorozhkin, E. M., & Epaneshnikov, V. V. (2020). Present-day management of universities in Russia: Prospects and challenges of e-learning. Education and Information Technologies, 25(1), 611–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09978-0
Vogelzang, J., & Admiraal, W. F. (2017). Classroom action research on formative assessment in a context-based chemistry course. Educational Action Research, 25(1), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2016.1177564
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Julius Koloway, Christine Kattie
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.png)
.gif)
.png)
.png)
.png){kind=logo}
.gif)
.png)
