Jurnal Edunitro review policy:

At least two peer reviewers will review each submitted paper. The reviewer does not know the author's identity, and the author also does not know the reviewer's identity (double-blind review method).

The peer review process will consider the following:

Ethics: The author has ensured research work and publication ethics.

Originality: maximum allowable plagiarism level of 20%; If more than that is found, the article will be immediately rejected. Checking for plagiarism is carried out at the beginning of the article's entry and the revision of the paper using the Turnitin application service.

Paper relevance to the scope of the journal.

Novelty, objectivity and scientific impact.

The theoretical framework and research gap are is presented and explained.

The problem statement is presented and explained.

The research questions are presented and explained.

Research methods are appropriate and presented.

Results are presented and discussed.

References must be comprehensive and uniform with the specified format, namely APA.

Articles accepted:

1. Results of the review: minor revisions are required.

2. Results of the review: a significant (major) revision is needed.

3. Results of the review: no revision is required at all. 

Rejected article:

Editors will engage other reviewers if the recommendations are contradictory. The editor-in-chief makes the final decision.