Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics

The ethics of publication is a statement that applies to all parties involved in the publication of journals including authors, editors, reviewers and journal managers in this case the Department of Economic Education of Faculty of Economic and Business State University manado. This statement is based on the ethical provisions of scientific publications established by the Indonesian Institute of Science's Research Professors Council (MPR) in 2014.

Author Ethics

1. Reporting. The author must provide information about the process and results of his research to the editor honestly, clearly, and thoroughly, while keeping his research data well and secure.
2. Originality and plagiarism. The author must ensure that the manuscript that has been sent/submitted to the editor is the original manuscript, written by himself, sourced from his own ideas and ideas, and not tracing the writing or ideas and ideas of others. Authors are strictly prohibited from dissing the names of reference sources quoted to other people's names.
3. Repetition of delivery. The author must inform that the manuscript sent and submitted to the editor is a manuscript that has never been submitted or submitted to the publisher of a journal or other publication. If there is a "redundancy" of the delivery of the manuscript to another publisher, the editor will reject the manuscript submitted by the author.
4. Author status. The author must inform the editor that the author has competence or qualifications in a particular field of expertise that corresponds to the field of published science, namely literature. The author who submits the manuscript to the editor is the first author so that if a problem is found in the process of publishing the manuscript can be completed immediately.
5. Scriptwriting error. The author must inform the editor immediately if any errors are found in the writing of the script, both the results of the review and the edits. Such writing errors include the writing of names, affiliates or agencies, quotations, and other writings that may reduce the meaning and meaning of the manuscript. If that happens, the author should immediately propose a script repair.
6. Disclosure of conflicts of interest. The author must understand the ethics of the above scientific publications to avoid conflicts of interest with others, so that the manuscript can be processed smoothly and safely.

Ethics Editor

1. Publication decision. Editors must ensure a thorough, transparent, objective, fair, and thoughtful process of reviewing the manuscript. This is the basis for the editor making decisions on a script, rejected or accepted. In this case, the editorial board serves as the script selection team.
2. Publication information. Editors must ensure that screenwriting guidelines for authors and other interested parties can be clearly accessed in the Telematics Journal, both print and electronic versions.
3. Division of peer-reviewed manuscripts. The editor must ensure the reviewer and the script material for the review, as well as inform the terms and process of the review of the script clearly to the reviewer.
4. Objectivity and neutrality. Editors must be objective, neutral, and honest in editing the script, regardless of the author's gender, business side, tribe, religion, race, inter-group, and nationality.
5. Confidentiality. Editors should take good care of any information, especially with respect to the privacy of the author and the distribution of the script.
6. Disclosure of conflicts of interest. Editors should understand the ethics of the above scientific publications to avoid conflicts of interest with others, so that the process of publishing the manuscript runs smoothly and safely.

Reviewer Ethics

1. Objectivity and neutrality. Reviewers must be honest, objective, unbiased, independent, and only side with scientific truth. The process of reviewing the manuscript is conducted professionally without distinguishing the sex, business side, tribe, religion, race, inter-group, and nationality of the author.
2. Clarity of reference sources. Reviewers must ensure that the source of the reference/quotation of the manuscript is appropriate and credible (accountable). If any errors or irregularities are found in the writing of reference/citation sources, reviewers must promptly inform the editor to make improvements by the author according to the reviewer's notes.
3. Effectiveness of peer-review. Reviewers must respond to the script that has been submitted by the editor and work according tothe set peer-reviewtime (maximum 2 weeks). If additional time is required in the review the manuscript must immediately report (confirmation) to the editor's secretariat.
4. Disclosure of conflicts of interest. Reviewers must understand the ethics of the above scientific publications to avoid conflicts of interest with others, so that the process of publishing the manuscript runs smoothly and safely.

Journal Manager Ethics

1. Decision-making. Journal managers or editorial boards must describe the mission and objectives of the organization, especially with regard to policy setting and journal publishing decisions in the absence of any particular interest.
2. Freedom. Journal managers should give reviewers and editors the freedom to create a comfortable work environment and respect the privacy of the author.
3. Guarantees and promotions. Journal managers must guarantee and protect intellectual property rights (copyright), as well as be transparent in managing funds received by third parties. Apart from that, journal managers must publish and promote publication results to the public by providing guarantees of the usefulness of using the manuscript.
4. Disclosure of conflicts of interest. Journal managers must understand the above scientific publication ethics to avoid conflicts of interest with other parties, so that the manuscript publishing process runs smoothly and safely.