The Influence of Interest and Creativity on Learning Achievement Students of SMKN 1 Tongkuno
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53682/edunitro.v2i2.4067Keywords:
interest, creativity, learning achievementAbstract
This study aims to: (1) determine the effect of interest in learning on student achievement in the electrical installation engineering expertise program 11th class SMK Negeri 1 Tongkuno, and (2)To determine the effect of learning creativity on student achievement in the electrical installation engineering skill program 11th class SMK Negeri 1 Tongkuno, (3) To determine the effect of interest and creativity on student achievement in the electrical installation engineering expertise program 11th class SMK Negeri 1 Tongkuno. The population in this study was all students of class XI-a (28 students) and students of class XI-b (25 students) at SMK Negeri 1 Tongkuno, with 53 students, so this research is a population study. Questionnaires and documentation do data collection. Questionnaire to collect data on interest and creativity in learning while documentation to collect data on learning achievement. This instrument trial was conducted on 35 students of 11th class TITL SMK Negeri 1 Tongkuno; the multiple regression analysis techniques were used in the data analysis. The analysis requirements test was conducted before data analysis, including normality, multicollinearity, autocorrelation, and heteroscedasticity. The result of this study is that (1) learning interest (X1) has a significant effect on learning achievement (Y), which is indicated by a significance value of .000 < .023 so that the first hypothesis proposed can be accepted. Learning creativity (X2) has a significant effect on student achievement (Y); this is indicated by a significance value of .004 < .05, so the second hypothesis formulated in this study can be accepted. Based on the result of hypothesis testing, it claims that student progress in the electrical installation engineering competence program 11th class SMK Negeri 1 Tongkuno is significantly influenced by enthusiasm and creativity, it can be proven by the significance value of F (F-sig) of = .000 which means it is smaller than α = .05 (F-sig .000 < .05).
References
Abu, A., & Widodo, S. (2004). Psikologi Belajar. Rineka Cipta.
ANIKMA, W. (2017). UPAYA GURU DALAM MENGATASI DIFERENSIASI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN FIKIH.
Arifina, Y. (2019). Peran Tata Kelola Perusahaan Dan Risiko Pelaporan Keuangan Dalam Pembentukan Komite Manajemen Risiko Yang Terpisah. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 15(2), 246. https://doi.org/10.24167/jab.v16i1.1365
DeCarlo, L. T., & Cross, D. V. (1990). Sequential effects in magnitude scaling: Models and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119(4), 375.
Dormann, C. F., Elith, J., Bacher, S., Buchmann, C., Carl, G., Carré, G., Marquéz, J. R. G., Gruber, B., Lafourcade, B., Leitão, P. J., Münkemüller, T., Mcclean, C., Osborne, P. E., Reineking, B., Schröder, B., Skidmore, A. K., Zurell, D., & Lautenbach, S. (2013). Collinearity: A review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography, 36(1), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x
Hamdani. (2011). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Pustaka Setia.
Jacob, W. J., Wang, Y., Pelkowski, T. L., Karsidi, R., & Priyanto, A. D. (2012). Higher Education Reform in Indonesia: University Governance and Autonomy. In University Governance and Reform (pp. 225–240). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137040107_15
Kamagi, W., Memah, V., & Ticoh, J. (2021). Hubungan Kuliah Daring dan Minat Belajar dengan Prestasi Belajar Mahasiswa Pendidikan Teknik Elektro. Jurnal Eduntro, 1(2), 9–18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53682/edunitro.v1i2.1880
Khaled, W., Lin, J., Han, Z., Zhao, Y., & Hao, H. (2019). Test for Heteroscedasticity in Partially Linear Regression Models. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 32(4), 1194–1210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11424-019-7374-2
Mamahit, C. E. J. (2019). ANALISIS PENGARUH MANAJEMEN WAKTU DAN MOTIVASI MENGAJAR TERHADAP KINERJA DOSEN. Manajerial, 18(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17509/manajerial.v18i1.11002
Putra, A. T., Tampang, B., & Ponto, H. (2021). Hubungan Minat dan Motivasi dengan Hasil Belajar Elektronika Dasar. JURNAL EDUNITRO: Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, 1(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53682/edunitro.v1i1.1040
Sermatan, S., Sangi, N., & Sanger, R. (20121). Hubungan Minat dan Motivasi dengan Hasil Belajar Teknik Instalasi Penerangan Listrik Siswa SMKN 2 Tanimbar Selatan. JURNAL EDUNITRO: Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, 1(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53682/edunitro.v1i2.1141
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. In METODE PENELITIAN ILMIAH.
Sugiyono. (2015). Statistik untuk Penelitian. Alfabeta.
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53–55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
Yazici, B., & Yolacan, S. (2007). A comparison of various tests of normality. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 77(2), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/10629360600678310
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Usman Usman, Badiun Badiun, Nontje Sangi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.png)
.gif)
.png)
.gif)
.png)
