AN ASSESSMENT ON READABILITY OF READING TEXT IN ENGLISH SUMMATIVE TEST FOR FIFTH GRADE SMP NEGERI TOMPASO
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36582/jotell.v1i2.3503Keywords:
Readability, Reading Text, Assessment, Summative TextAbstract
The present study dealt with the research problem: Are reading texts in 2020 summative assessment for fifth semester students at SMP Negeri Tompaso readable assessed using Flesch reading ease formula? The study is a quantitative content analysis with fifth semester summative test as the source of data. The data were reading texts with more than 100 words in length. The data were analyzed quantitatively using automatic online readability checker. Result of the data analysis indicates that of 6 reading texts that are analyzed, four (text 1, 2, 5 and 6) ranged from 79.4 (fairly easy to read) to 90.4 (very easy to read), one (66. I) is moderate or average, and still one (39.6) (3) is difficult to read. It can be concluded that only one of the analyzed texts is appropriate for the target students or test-takers. Consequently, test items assessing reading comprehension ability do not yield students reading ability properly.
References
Alderson,J.C. 2000. Assessing Reading. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO97805 l l 732935
Alyousef, Hesham Suleiman. 2005.Teaching reading comprehension to ESVEFL learner. Language Learning Journal 5(1):143-154
Bachman, L.F. 1999. Fundamental Considerations in Language Testing. Oxford Umvers1ty Press, Oxford.
Berel on, B. 1952. Content analysis in communication research. Free Press.
Bennan, R A. 1984. Syntactic Components of the Foreign Language Reading Process. In: Alderson, J.C. and Urquhart, A.H., Eds., Reading in a Foreign Language, Longman, London, 139-159.
Carrell, P.L. 1987. Readability in ESL. Reading in a Foreign Language, 4, 21-40. Carrell, Patricia L. & Eisterhol d, J.C. 1983. Schema theory and ESL reading Pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 17(4), 553-573
Dhormanis, M., Hayati, R & Hambali, M. 2018. The Analysis of English Reading Texts Readability and Reading Level of the Tenth Grade Students of SMA Negeri 4 Palembang. Sriwijaya University.
Downing, P., Giv6n, T. and Givon, T. 1995. Functionalism and Grammar. Language, 73, 403. https://doi.org/10.2307/416034
Flesch, Rudolf. 2016. How to Write Plain English. University of Canterbury.
Forster, KI. and Bednall, E.S. 1976. Terminating and Exhaustive Search in Lexical Access. Memory and Cognition, 4, 53-61. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213255
Franzosi, Robert P. 2004. Content Analysis. In Melissa Hardy & Alan Bryman (eds) Handbook of Data Analysis. Sage.
Gilakjani, Abbas Pourhosein & Ahmadi, Mohammad R. 211. A Study of Factors Affecting EFL Learners' English Listening Comprehension and the Strategies for Improvement. Journal of Language Teaching and Research 2(5). DOI:10.4304/jl tr.2.5.977-988
Halliday, M.A.K. 2008. Complementarities in Language. The Commercial Press, Beijing.
Lalogiroth, A., & Tatipang, D. P. (2020). An Analysis Of English National Exam And English Teachers’perception Using Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy. Journal of English Culture, Language, Literature and Education, 8(1), 1-21.
Lumentut, Y., & Lengkoan, F. (2021). The Relationships Of Psycholinguistics In Acquisition And Language Learning. Journal of English Culture, Language, Literature and Education, 9(1), 17-26.
Maryansyah Yupika. 2016. An Analysis on Readability of English Reading Texts for Grade IX Students at MTsN 2 Kota Bengkulu. Premise, Vol 5, No I.
Mikulecky, Beatrice. 2009. Teaching Reading in a Second Language. Pearson
Morton, J. 1979. Facilitation in Word Recognition: Experiments Causing Change in the Logogen Model. Processing of Visible Language. Springer, Berlin.
Pikirang, C. C., Liando, N., & Wuntu, C. N. (2021). A Correlational Study Between Learners’satisfactions With Offline Class And English Self-Efficacy During The Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of English Culture, Language, Literature and Education, 9(1), 73-85.
Richard, Jack. 1992. Learning How to Teach: Study of EFL Teachers in Pre-service Training. Hong Kong: City Polytechnic of Hong Kong.
Paranduk, R., & Karisi, Y. (2020). The Effectiveness Of Non-Verbal Communication In Teaching And Learning English: A Systematic Review. Journal of English Culture, Language, Literature and Education, 8(2), 145-159.
Redish, Janice. 2000. Readability formula have even more limitations than Klare discusses. ACM Journal of Computer Documentation 24(3):132-137.
Richard, Jack. 1992. Learning How to Teach: a study of EFL Teachers in Pre-service Training. Hong Kong: City Polytechnic of Hong Kong.
Standal, T. 1997. Computer-Measured Readability, Computers in the school, 4, 123-132.
Tangiduk, Y. K., Samola, N., & Rorimpandey, R. (2021). Optimizing Students’reading Comprehension Of Descriptive Text Through E-Learning Method With Whatsapp Application At Students Of SMA NEGERI 1 BUKO: Optimizing, Descriptive Text, E-learning Method. Journal of English Culture, Language, Literature and Education, 9(1), 1-16.
Ure, J. 1971. Lexical density and Register Differentiation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 5, 96-104.
Uri, Nurul Farenah Mohamad & Azi, Mohd Salehhudin Abd. 2018. Assesing Readability of a National Exam reading texts in Malaysia. Journal of English Language Teaching, Volume 4, issue 1.
Viking, B. 1989. What makes a text easy or difficult to Understand? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 33, 259-267.
Wixson, Karen K., Charles W. Peters, Elaine M. Weber and Edward D. Roeber. New Direction in statewide Reading Assesment. (pp. 749-754).