Students Perceptions of Immediate Feedback and Delayed Feedback in Learning Writing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53682/eclue.v13i1.12094Keywords:
Delayed feedback; Immediate feedback; students’ perception; WritingAbstract
This study stems from the existence of corrective feedback whose timing has become a hotly debated issue and requires further empirical investigation by second language researchers This needs to be done because related to the ideal time to implement corrective feedback some studies confirm that immediate feedback has more positive effects and maximizes students learning opportunities However on the other hand some researchers claim that of the two types of feedback delayed feedback is more influential and beneficial in students language development This study aims to further explore students perceptions of immediate feedback and delayed feedback in the writing learning process Descriptive Qualitative Method was carried out in this study by involving 20 students as samples The instruments used in collecting data are questionnaire and interview The data analysis technique used is an interactive model consisting of data collection data filtering data display and conclusion making or verification The results of data analysis showed that all responses to immediate corrective feedback were positive as indicated by 66 of students chose strongly agree and 34 chose agree As for delayed corrective feedback only 35 of students agreed and the remaining 65 disagreed < p>
References
Arroyo D C Yilmaz Y 2018 An Open for Replication Study: The Role of Feedback Timing in Synchronous Computer Mediated Communication Language Learning 68 4 942 972 https: doi org 10 1111 lang 12300
Bitchener J Ferris D R 2012 Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing In Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition and Writing Routledge https: doi org 10 4324 9780203832400
Brown D 2016 The type and linguistic foci of oral corrective feedback in the L2 classroom: A meta analysis Language Teaching Research 20 4 436 458
Choi S Y Li S 2012 Corrective feedback and learner uptake in a child ESOL classroom RELC Journal 43 3 331 351 https: doi org 10 1177 0033688212463274
Cohen L Manion L Morrison K 2017 Research Methods in Education In Research Methods in Education routledge https: doi org 10 4324 9781315456539
Ene E Kosobucki V 2016 Rubrics and corrective feedback in ESL writing: A longitudinal case study of an L2 writer Assessing Writing 30 3 20 https: doi org https: doi org 10 1016 j asw 2016 06 003
Fu M Li S 2022 The Effects of Immediate and Delayed Corrective Feedback on L2 Development Studies in Second Language Acquisition 44 1 2 34 https: doi org 10 1017 S0272263120000388
Harmer J 2007 The practice of English language teaching 4th ed England: Pearson Education Limited
Hassan S Begum I Gul Hassan N 2018 Students Perceptions about the Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique IF AT in Team Based Learning Education in Medicine Journal 10 1 23 32 https: doi org 10 21315 eimj2018 10 1 4
Jalaluddin I Md Yunus M Yamat H 2011 Improving Malaysian rural learners writing skill: A case study Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 15 1845 1851 https: doi org 10 1016 j sbspro 2011 04 013
Kheradmand N Sayadiyan S 2016 Comparative Investigation of the Effects of Immediate and Delayed Error Correction on the Achievement of Male and Female Iranian EFL Learners Writing Skill In International J Soc Sci Education Vol 6
Lewis M 2002 Giving feedback in Language Classes RELC Portfolio Series I Singapore Oxford Graphic Printers Pte Ltd
Li S 2020 What is the ideal time to provide corrective feedback? Replication of Li Zhu Ellis 2016 and Arroyo Yilmaz 2018 Language Teaching 53 1 96 108 https: doi org 10 1017 S026144481800040X
Loewen S 2005 Incidental Focus on Form and Second Language Learning Longman
Mack Natasha Woodsong Cynthia 2005 Qualitative research methods : a data collector s field guide FLI USAID
zt rk Y 2023 The Effect of Delayed and Immediate Oral Corrective Feedback on L2 Pronunciation in Emergency Distance Education Nev ehir Hac Bekta Veli niversitesi SBE Dergisi 13 1 573 587 https: doi org 10 30783 nevsosbilen 1230037
Sheen Y 2010 Differential effects of oral and written corrective feedback in the ESL classroom Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32 2 203 234 https: doi org 10 1017 S0272263109990507
van Blankenstein F M Tru escu G O van der Rijst R M Saab N 2019 Immediate and delayed effects of a modeling example on the application of principles of good feedback practice: a quasi experimental study Instructional Science 47 3 299 318 https: doi org 10 1007 s11251 019 09482 5
Walgito B 2003 Psikologi Sosial suatu pengantar
Yasaei H 2016 The effect of immediate vs delayed oral corrective feedback on the writing accuracy of Iranian intermediate EFL learners Theory and Practice in Language Studies 6 9 1780
