Metaphors as the Construction of Ideology and Power Relations in The Scarlet Letter
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53682/5d389e85Keywords:
Metaphor, Ideology, Power relations, Critical Discourse Analysis, LiteratureAbstract
This study aims to analyze the role of metaphors in constructing ideology and power relations in The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne using the Critical Discourse Analysis framework proposed by Norman Fairclough. This research employs a qualitative descriptive method with textual data derived from metaphorical expressions in the novel. The analysis is conducted through three dimensions: text, discursive practice, and social practice. The findings reveal that metaphors function not only as stylistic devices but also as ideological instruments that represent moral values, social stigma, and mechanisms of control within Puritan society. Metaphors such as scarlet letter, moral wilderness, and dungeon of his own heart construct meanings related to sin, isolation, and internal conflict, while simultaneously reflecting oppressive power relations. Furthermore, the study shows that metaphors also serve as a medium of resistance, where symbols of punishment are transformed into sources of identity and empowerment. Thus, this study demonstrates that metaphors play a significant role in constructing, maintaining, and negotiating ideology and power relations in literary texts.
References
Cameron, L., & Maslen, R. (2010). Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities. London: Equinox.
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor (2nd ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news: Discourse and ideology in the press. London: Routledge.
Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
Hawthorne, N. (1994). The Scarlet Letter. New York: Dover Publications.
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by (Revised ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lengkoan, F. (2017). A study on the use of songs to improve students’ pronunciation and listening skill. Journal of English Language and Literature Teaching, 2(02).
Liando, N., & Lumettu, R. (2017). Students’ personal initiative towards their speaking performance. International Education Studies, 10(8), 21–28.
Liu, Y. (2025). Critical metaphor analysis and ideology in discourse. Critical Discourse Studies, 22(1), 1–15.
Mahmudah, M. (2026). Metaphors of social justice in digital discourse. Jurnal Gramatika, 12(1), 34–48.
Mohammed, D. K. (2025). Critical discourse analysis of political discourse. Journal of Language and Politics, 24(2), 210–225.
Obasi, J. C., & Andy, A. U. (2025). Metaphorical expressions in political discourse: A cognitive linguistic analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 205, 45–60.
Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics: A resource book for students. London: Routledge.
van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.
van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Wafa, A. (2025). Critical discourse analysis of leadership discourse. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 15(1), 55–70.
Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of English Culture, Language, Literature and Education

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.