The Teaching of Intermediate Grammar Using A Student-Centered Learning Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53682/eclue.v11i2.6146Keywords:
1st student-centered learning approach, 2nd intermediate grammar.Abstract
The active learning component of the student-centered learning strategy involves students working in teams to complete projects and solve issues. They also ask and answer their own questions, discuss topics, and provide explanations in class. This study intends to examine how lecturers view the student-centered learning strategy when teaching intermediate grammar to second-graders in higher education. It also seeks to ascertain how effective this technique is in this setting. This study specifically responds to the following queries: 1). How do the teachers feel about implementing a student-centered learning strategy when instructing intermediate English grammar? 2). How do the pre-test and post-test results of the control and experimental groups compare? An experimental research design was used in this study. The control group and the experimental group are the two groups that make up this study. First-graders in the experimental group were steered through student-centered education to improve their command of intermediate grammar. The findings demonstrated that student-centered learning was highly successful, while instructor perceptions were favorable, neutral, and negative. So, there are still pros and cons if teaching grammar uses a student-centered learning approach
References
Azar, B. (2007). Grammar-based teaching: A practitioner’s perspective. tesl-ej.org.
Brooks, J.G. & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. VA: ASCD.
Buditama, M. (2017). Student-centered learning approach in teaching basic grammar. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 7(2), 209. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v7i2.534
Eggen, P. D. & Kauchak, D. P. (2001). Strategies for teachers: Teaching content and thinking skills (A. & Bacon (ed.).
Hannafin, M. J. & Land, S. M. (1997). The foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced student-centered learning environments. Instructional Science, 25(3), 167–202. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002997414652
Haussamen, B., Benjamin, A., Kolln, M., & Wheeler, R. S. (2003). Grammar alive! A guide for teachers. Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.
Holt, L. C. & Kysilka, M. (2006). Instructional patterns: Strategies for maximizing student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kornell, N. & Bjork, R. A. (2007). The promise and perils of self-regulated study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 219–224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194055
Kumayas, T. A., & Lengkoan, F. (2023). The Challenges of Teaching Grammar at the University Level : Learning From the Experience of English Lecturer. 11(1), 98–105.
Rahmawan, A. D., & Wiyanah, S. (2018). Student-Centered Learning and Testing As an Approach To Develop Students? Proficiency on English Sentence Structure To Promote Autonomous Learning. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 21(2), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v21i2.1405
Soylu Baştuğ, D., & Broutin, J. (2021). Designing a Lesson Plan About Teaching French Grammar as a Foreign Language from a Social Constructivist Approach. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 12(2), 13. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.12n.2.p.13
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of English Culture, Language, Literature and Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Submission Guidelines
