IMPROVING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION THROUGH LISTEN-READ-DISCUSS (LRD) STRATEGY AT SMP KRISTEN KAKASKASEN

Authors

  • Gloria S. Tuuk Universitas Negeri Manado
  • Sanerita T. olii Universitas Negeri Manado
  • Paula Hampp Universitas Negeri Manado

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36582/jotell.v3i3.8655

Keywords:

Listen-Read-Discuss (LRD) Strategy, Reading Comprehension, Teaching.

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to evaluate how well the LRD strategy works to improve reading comprehension. Using a methodological framework with pre- and post-test assessments, the study investigates the relationship between eighth-grade students' increased reading comprehension levels and their implementation of the LRD strategy. The dynamic nature of English language instruction makes the choice of a suitable approach crucial. Due to the complexity of language acquisition, creative methods are needed, taking into account the interests of the students as well as existing arrangements and provisions. The findings demonstrate the LRD strategy's strong positive effects, with students' growth attributed mostly to their intrinsic drive and active participation. Due to the strategy's inherent flexibility, training may be tailored to each student's ability level. These results highlight the LRD strategy's ability to enhance reading comprehension results. Because of the strategy's flexibility and the characteristics that have been found to be important, it can be used to students of different skill levels, which has significance for middle school teachers and policymakers.

References

Aitchison, J. (2012). linguistics made easy. Pearson

Arikunto, S. (2006). Manajemen Penelitian. Rineka Cipta.

Bozorgian, H. (2012). The Relationship between Listening and Other Language Skills in International English Language Testing System. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.4.657-663

Cekiso, M. (2012). Reading comprehension and strategy awareness of Grade 11 English second language learners. Reading & Writing, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/rw.v3i1.23

Chaer Abdul, & Agustina Leonie. (2004). Sosiolinguistik: Perkenalan Awal (Cet.2). Rineka Cipta.

English Language Teaching Methods in Uganda: From Past to Present. (2020). International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, 7(11). https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0381.0711007

Hamied, F. A. (2012). English in Multicultural and Multilingual Indonesian Education (pp. 63–78). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4578-0_5

Koschate-Fischer, N., & Schandelmeier, S. (2014). A guideline for designing experimental studies in marketing research and a critical discussion of selected problem areas. Journal of Business Economics, 84(6), 793–826. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-014-0708-6

LAI, Y. (2009). Language Learning Strategy Use and English Proficiency of University Freshmen in Taiwan. TESOL Quarterly, 43(2), 255–280. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00167.x

Mc Laughlin, T. (2015). Introduction: Reading Bodies. In Reading and the Body (pp. 1–42). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-52289-4_1

McKay, S. L. (2003). Toward an appropriate EIL pedagogy: re-examining common ELT assumptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1473-4192.00035

Nation, K. (2019). Children’s reading difficulties, language, and reflections on the simple view of reading. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 24(1), 47–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/19404158.2019.1609272

Patahuddin, P., Syawal, S., & Bin-Tahir, S. Z. (2017). Investigating Indonesian EFL Learners’ Learning and Acquiring English Vocabulary. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(4), 128. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v7n4p128

Puskur. (2006). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan. Depdiknas.

Rahmadani, A., Syariful, S., & Restavia, O. (2022). Dampak Program Kampus Mengajar Terhadap Keterampilan Pemberian Layanan Bimbingan Konseling di Sekolah Dasar: Studi Kualitatif pada Mahasiswa BKI Universitas Al-azhar Indonesia. JURNAL Al-AZHAR INDONESIA SERI HUMANIORA, 7(1), 66. https://doi.org/10.36722/sh.v7i1.996

Raynaldo, M. T., & Panjaitan, N. B. (2022). Meta Analysis on The Correlation Between Listen-Read-Discuss (L-R-D) and Reading Comprehension. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(11), 5264–5270. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v5i11.1257

Snow, C. (2002). Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension. Rand Corporation.

Syamsir, N. F., Astri, Z., Suhartina, S., & Noer, F. (2021). Improving reading comprehension skill through Listen-Read-Discuss (LRD) learning strategy. Journal of Science and Education (JSE), 1(2), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.56003/jse.v1i2.28

Tawali, T. (2021). Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension Through Listen-Read-Discuss (LRD) Strategy. Jurnal Paedagogy, 8(3), 322. https://doi.org/10.33394/jp.v8i3.3852.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-02

How to Cite

Tuuk, G. S., olii, S. T., & Hampp, P. (2024). IMPROVING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION THROUGH LISTEN-READ-DISCUSS (LRD) STRATEGY AT SMP KRISTEN KAKASKASEN. JoTELL : Journal of Teaching English, Linguistics, and Literature, 3(3), 311-323. https://doi.org/10.36582/jotell.v3i3.8655